ANIL HEMCHAND MAVI vs GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT Advocate - PP — 256/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC.APPLN-SESSIONS

CNR: GJPM010008102026

Filing Number

256/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

256/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT GODHRA

Judge

6-5th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 10-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483
Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A),65(E),81,83,98(2)
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,334(4)
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 177,184

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANIL HEMCHAND MAVI

    Adv. S P CHAUHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    The court granted regular bail to Anil Hemchand Mavi in a liquor smuggling case, finding that the investigation was complete, charge-sheet filed, and continued custody would constitute pretrial conviction despite the serious nature of offences under the Prohibition Act and BNS. The applicant was released on Rs. 25,000 surety with conditions including non-absconding guarantees and mandatory trial appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    5th Addl District Judge

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 256/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted regular bail to Anil Hemchand Mavi in a liquor smuggling case, finding that the investigation was complete, charge-sheet filed, and continued custody would constitute pretrial conviction despite the serious nature of offences under the Prohibition Act and BNS. The applicant was released on Rs. 25,000 surety with conditions including non-absconding guarantees and mandatory trial appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case