GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs RAJESHBHAI KANABHAI PAGI Advocate - R A HADIYEL — 8/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 137(2),87,64(2)(M),65(1). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed

PCSO - SPECIAL CASE - PCSO

CNR: GJPM010007482026

Filing Number

8/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

8/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT GODHRA

Judge

2-4th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

887

Police Station

SHAHERA POLICE STATION - PANCHMAHALS DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 137(2),87,64(2)(M),65(1)
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 Section 4,6,12,17

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. PP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJESHBHAI KANABHAI PAGI Advocate - R A HADIYEL

  2. 2.VIJAYBHAI JYANTIBHAI PAGI

    Adv. D A SHETH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: Special POCSO Case No. 8/2026 Court Decision: Both accused, Rajeshbhai Kanabhai Pagi and Vijaybhai Jyantibhai Pagi, were acquitted of all charges under IPC sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)(m), 65(1), 54 and POCSO Act sections 4, 6, 12, 17. The court found insufficient direct evidence to prove the prosecution's case beyond reasonable doubt, despite circumstantial evidence and medical examinations. The victim's testimony did not corroborate the alleged kidnapping and sexual abuse claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-May-2026

    Disposed

    4th Addl District Judge

  4. 07-May-2026

    Judgement

    4th Addl District Judge

  5. 05-May-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  6. 01-May-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  7. 29-Apr-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  8. 27-Apr-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  9. 23-Apr-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  10. 21-Apr-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  11. 17-Apr-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  12. 15-Apr-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  13. 09-Apr-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  14. 07-Apr-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  15. 03-Apr-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  16. 01-Apr-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  17. 27-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  18. 24-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  19. 20-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  20. 17-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  21. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  22. 10-Mar-2026

    Framing Of Charge/Plea

    4th Addl District Judge

  23. 06-Mar-2026

    Framing Of Charge/Plea

    4th Addl District Judge

  24. 02-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 8/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Special POCSO Case No. 8/2026 Court Decision: Both accused, Rajeshbhai Kanabhai Pagi and Vijaybhai Jyantibhai Pagi, were acquitted of all charges under IPC sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)(m), 65(1), 54 and POCSO Act sections 4, 6, 12, 17. The court found insufficient direct evidence to prove the prosecution's case beyond reasonable doubt, despite circumstantial evidence and medical examinations. The victim's testimony did not corroborate the alleged kidnapping and sexual abuse claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case