GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs RAJESHBHAI KANABHAI PAGI Advocate - R A HADIYEL — 8/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 137(2),87,64(2)(M),65(1). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 11th May 2026.
PCSO - SPECIAL CASE - PCSO
CNR: GJPM010007482026
Filing Number
8/2026
Filing Date
24-02-2026
Registration No
8/2026
Registration Date
24-02-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT GODHRA
Judge
2-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
11th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
887
Police Station
SHAHERA POLICE STATION - PANCHMAHALS DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. PP
Respondent(s)
RAJESHBHAI KANABHAI PAGI Advocate - R A HADIYEL
VIJAYBHAI JYANTIBHAI PAGI
Adv. D A SHETH
Hearing History
Judge: 2-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-05-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 05-05-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 01-05-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 29-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Special POCSO Case No. 8/2026 Court Decision: Both accused, Rajeshbhai Kanabhai Pagi and Vijaybhai Jyantibhai Pagi, were acquitted of all charges under IPC sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)(m), 65(1), 54 and POCSO Act sections 4, 6, 12, 17. The court found insufficient direct evidence to prove the prosecution's case beyond reasonable doubt, despite circumstantial evidence and medical examinations. The victim's testimony did not corroborate the alleged kidnapping and sexual abuse claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Special POCSO Case No. 8/2026 Court Decision: Both accused, Rajeshbhai Kanabhai Pagi and Vijaybhai Jyantibhai Pagi, were acquitted of all charges under IPC sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)(m), 65(1), 54 and POCSO Act sections 4, 6, 12, 17. The court found insufficient direct evidence to prove the prosecution's case beyond reasonable doubt, despite circumstantial evidence and medical examinations. The victim's testimony did not corroborate the alleged kidnapping and sexual abuse claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts