IRSHAD YUSUF MITHA vs GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT Advocate - SPP — 233/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 07th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC.APPLN-SESSIONS
CNR: GJPM010007392026
Filing Number
233/2026
Filing Date
24-Feb-2026
Registration No
233/2026
Registration Date
24-Feb-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT GODHRA
Judge
19-6th Addl District Judge
Decision Date
07-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 10-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.IRSHAD YUSUF MITHA
Adv. S A SAIYED
Respondent(s)
-
1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT Advocate - SPP
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Court Decision Summary The 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Panchmahals rejected the regular bail application of Ishaq Yusuf Mitha under Section 483 of BNSS. The applicant was arrested for offences under the Gujarat Animal Preservation (Amendment) Act 2017 and related animal cruelty laws for allegedly keeping a bull tied cruelly for slaughter. The court found the charges serious, supported by prima facie evidence (knife, rope, weighing scale seized from the spot), noted the applicant's criminal antecedents, and determined no material change in circumstances warranted bail despite the charge-sheet being filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Mar-2026
Disposed
6th Addl District Judge
-
05-Mar-2026
Hearing
6th Addl District Judge
-
02-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 233/2026
Court Decision Summary The 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Panchmahals rejected the regular bail application of Ishaq Yusuf Mitha under Section 483 of BNSS. The applicant was arrested for offences under the Gujarat Animal Preservation (Amendment) Act 2017 and related animal cruelty laws for allegedly keeping a bull tied cruelly for slaughter. The court found the charges serious, supported by prima facie evidence (knife, rope, weighing scale seized from the spot), noted the applicant's criminal antecedents, and determined no material change in circumstances warranted bail despite the charge-sheet being filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts