KESHUBHAI @ KISHOR ABHESINH DABHI vs GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT Advocate - PP — 232/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 06th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC.APPLN-SESSIONS
CNR: GJPM010007372026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
232/2026
Filing Date
24-02-2026
Registration No
232/2026
Registration Date
24-02-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT GODHRA
Judge
19-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KESHUBHAI @ KISHOR ABHESINH DABHI
Adv. S R PATEL
BHARATSINH URFE RANGIT JAYSINH URFE JESHINGBHAI DABHI
DALPATBHAI SUFRABHAI DABHI
Respondent(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor)
JAYDIPSINH ABHESINH BAMNIYA
Adv. J R RATHOD
Hearing History
Judge: 19-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 05-03-2026 | ORDER | |
| 02-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 26-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Panchmahals rejected the regular bail application of three applicants arrested for offences including criminal conspiracy, attempted murder, and SC/ST atrocities. The court found that CCTV footage, Call Detail Records, and investigation materials substantiated the serious allegations against them. Despite the applicants arguing false implication and that the charge-sheet had been filed, the court held that no material change in circumstances warranted bail, considering the life-imprisonment severity of charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Panchmahals rejected the regular bail application of three applicants arrested for offences including criminal conspiracy, attempted murder, and SC/ST atrocities. The court found that CCTV footage, Call Detail Records, and investigation materials substantiated the serious allegations against them. Despite the applicants arguing false implication and that the charge-sheet had been filed, the court held that no material change in circumstances warranted bail, considering the life-imprisonment severity of charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts