KESHUBHAI @ KISHOR ABHESINH DABHI vs GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT Advocate - PP — 232/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC.APPLN-SESSIONS

CNR: GJPM010007372026

Filing Number

232/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

232/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT GODHRA

Judge

19-6th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 10-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 109(1),61(1)(B),189(1),324,351(2),352
Scheduled Casts and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Trocities) Act, 1989 Section 3(1)(R)(S),3(2)(5),3(2)(5-A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KESHUBHAI @ KISHOR ABHESINH DABHI

    Adv. S R PATEL

  2. 2.BHARATSINH URFE RANGIT JAYSINH URFE JESHINGBHAI DABHI

  3. 3.DALPATBHAI SUFRABHAI DABHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor)

  2. 2.JAYDIPSINH ABHESINH BAMNIYA

    Adv. J R RATHOD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Panchmahals rejected the regular bail application of three applicants arrested for offences including criminal conspiracy, attempted murder, and SC/ST atrocities. The court found that CCTV footage, Call Detail Records, and investigation materials substantiated the serious allegations against them. Despite the applicants arguing false implication and that the charge-sheet had been filed, the court held that no material change in circumstances warranted bail, considering the life-imprisonment severity of charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    6th Addl District Judge

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Order

    6th Addl District Judge

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    6th Addl District Judge

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 232/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Panchmahals rejected the regular bail application of three applicants arrested for offences including criminal conspiracy, attempted murder, and SC/ST atrocities. The court found that CCTV footage, Call Detail Records, and investigation materials substantiated the serious allegations against them. Despite the applicants arguing false implication and that the charge-sheet had been filed, the court held that no material change in circumstances warranted bail, considering the life-imprisonment severity of charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case