KAMLESHBHAI SUDESHBHAI HARVANI vs PRAKASHNATH BHAVARNATH YOGI — 168/2026
Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 08th April 2026.
MACMA - MAC MISC. APPLICATION
CNR: GJPM010004152026
Filing Number
168/2026
Filing Date
02-02-2026
Registration No
168/2026
Registration Date
02-02-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT GODHRA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Decision Date
08th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KAMLESHBHAI SUDESHBHAI HARVANI
Adv. K D THAKKAR
Respondent(s)
PRAKASHNATH BHAVARNATH YOGI
RAMESH JITUBHAI LADUMOR
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO.LTD
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Disposed
URGENT HEARING
URGENT HEARING
URGENT HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-04-2026 | URGENT HEARING |
| 27-03-2026 | URGENT HEARING |
| 13-03-2026 | URGENT HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Godhra allowed Kamleshbhai Sudeshbhai Harvani's application to condone a 175-day delay in filing a restoration application for his dismissed motor accident claim (MACP No.131/2022). The court prioritized substantial justice over technicality, finding that non-condonation would cause irreparable harm to the poor, illiterate petitioner while causing no prejudice to the insurance company respondents. The petitioner was directed to deposit Rs. 5,000 as costs within 7 days, after which the restoration application would be registered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Godhra allowed Kamleshbhai Sudeshbhai Harvani's application to condone a 175-day delay in filing a restoration application for his dismissed motor accident claim (MACP No.131/2022). The court prioritized substantial justice over technicality, finding that non-condonation would cause irreparable harm to the poor, illiterate petitioner while causing no prejudice to the insurance company respondents. The petitioner was directed to deposit Rs. 5,000 as costs within 7 days, after which the restoration application would be registered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts