KAMLESHBHAI SUDESHBHAI HARVANI vs PRAKASHNATH BHAVARNATH YOGI — 168/2026

Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 08th April 2026.

Case disposed

MACMA - MAC MISC. APPLICATION

CNR: GJPM010004152026

Filing Number

168/2026

Filing Date

02-Feb-2026

Registration No

168/2026

Registration Date

02-Feb-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT GODHRA

Judge

1-Principal District & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

08-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KAMLESHBHAI SUDESHBHAI HARVANI

    Adv. K D THAKKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRAKASHNATH BHAVARNATH YOGI

  2. 2.RAMESH JITUBHAI LADUMOR

  3. 3.UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO.LTD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Godhra allowed Kamleshbhai Sudeshbhai Harvani's application to condone a 175-day delay in filing a restoration application for his dismissed motor accident claim (MACP No.131/2022). The court prioritized substantial justice over technicality, finding that non-condonation would cause irreparable harm to the poor, illiterate petitioner while causing no prejudice to the insurance company respondents. The petitioner was directed to deposit Rs. 5,000 as costs within 7 days, after which the restoration application would be registered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Urgent Hearing

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  5. 27-Mar-2026

    Urgent Hearing

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 02-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 168/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Godhra allowed Kamleshbhai Sudeshbhai Harvani's application to condone a 175-day delay in filing a restoration application for his dismissed motor accident claim (MACP No.131/2022). The court prioritized substantial justice over technicality, finding that non-condonation would cause irreparable harm to the poor, illiterate petitioner while causing no prejudice to the insurance company respondents. The petitioner was directed to deposit Rs. 5,000 as costs within 7 days, after which the restoration application would be registered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case