KAMLESHBHAI SUDESHBHAI HARVANI vs PRAKASHNATH BHAVARNATH YOGI — 168/2026

Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 08th April 2026.

MACMA - MAC MISC. APPLICATION

CNR: GJPM010004152026

Case disposed

Filing Number

168/2026

Filing Date

02-02-2026

Registration No

168/2026

Registration Date

02-02-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT GODHRA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

Decision Date

08th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5

Petitioner(s)

KAMLESHBHAI SUDESHBHAI HARVANI

Adv. K D THAKKAR

Respondent(s)

PRAKASHNATH BHAVARNATH YOGI

RAMESH JITUBHAI LADUMOR

UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO.LTD

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

08-04-2026

Disposed

07-04-2026

URGENT HEARING

27-03-2026

URGENT HEARING

13-03-2026

URGENT HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

08-04-2026
ORDER

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Godhra allowed Kamleshbhai Sudeshbhai Harvani's application to condone a 175-day delay in filing a restoration application for his dismissed motor accident claim (MACP No.131/2022). The court prioritized substantial justice over technicality, finding that non-condonation would cause irreparable harm to the poor, illiterate petitioner while causing no prejudice to the insurance company respondents. The petitioner was directed to deposit Rs. 5,000 as costs within 7 days, after which the restoration application would be registered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Godhra allowed Kamleshbhai Sudeshbhai Harvani's application to condone a 175-day delay in filing a restoration application for his dismissed motor accident claim (MACP No.131/2022). The court prioritized substantial justice over technicality, finding that non-condonation would cause irreparable harm to the poor, illiterate petitioner while causing no prejudice to the insurance company respondents. The petitioner was directed to deposit Rs. 5,000 as costs within 7 days, after which the restoration application would be registered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT GODHRA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case