GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs MAHESHKUMAR URFE LALO PARVATBHAI PATELIYA Advocate - D A SHETH — 3/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 75(2),76. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 05th May 2026.
PCSO - SPECIAL CASE - PCSO
CNR: GJPM010004042026
Filing Number
3/2026
Filing Date
31-01-2026
Registration No
3/2026
Registration Date
31-01-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT GODHRA
Judge
2-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
05th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION
FIR Details
FIR Number
1081
Police Station
SHAHERA POLICE STATION - PANCHMAHALS DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. PP
Respondent(s)
MAHESHKUMAR URFE LALO PARVATBHAI PATELIYA Advocate - D A SHETH
Hearing History
Judge: 2-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FURTHER STATEMENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 28-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 24-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 22-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 16-04-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Maheshkumar Urfe Lalo Parvatbhai Pateliya Court Decision: The accused was convicted under IPC Sections 376(1)(i) and 76 (read together) and acquitted of charges under SC/ST (Atrocities Prevention) Act provisions. The victim's minority at time of offense could not be proven beyond doubt. Key Facts: On December 2, 2025, the accused allegedly attempted to sexually assault a minor girl near her village bus stand. The prosecution failed to conclusively establish the victim's age as being under 18 years at the time, though other elements of the crime were substantiated through victim and witness testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Maheshkumar Urfe Lalo Parvatbhai Pateliya Court Decision: The accused was convicted under IPC Sections 376(1)(i) and 76 (read together) and acquitted of charges under SC/ST (Atrocities Prevention) Act provisions. The victim's minority at time of offense could not be proven beyond doubt. Key Facts: On December 2, 2025, the accused allegedly attempted to sexually assault a minor girl near her village bus stand. The prosecution failed to conclusively establish the victim's age as being under 18 years at the time, though other elements of the crime were substantiated through victim and witness testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts