GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs MAHESHKUMAR URFE LALO PARVATBHAI PATELIYA Advocate - D A SHETH — 3/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 75(2),76. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

PCSO - SPECIAL CASE - PCSO

CNR: GJPM010004042026

Filing Number

3/2026

Filing Date

31-Jan-2026

Registration No

3/2026

Registration Date

31-Jan-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT GODHRA

Judge

2-4th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1081

Police Station

SHAHERA POLICE STATION - PANCHMAHALS DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 75(2),76
Scheduled Casts and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Trocities) Act, 1989 Section 3(1)(W)(1)(2),3(2)(5-A)
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 Section 8,12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. PP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MAHESHKUMAR URFE LALO PARVATBHAI PATELIYA Advocate - D A SHETH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Maheshkumar Urfe Lalo Parvatbhai Pateliya Court Decision: The accused was convicted under IPC Sections 376(1)(i) and 76 (read together) and acquitted of charges under SC/ST (Atrocities Prevention) Act provisions. The victim's minority at time of offense could not be proven beyond doubt. Key Facts: On December 2, 2025, the accused allegedly attempted to sexually assault a minor girl near her village bus stand. The prosecution failed to conclusively establish the victim's age as being under 18 years at the time, though other elements of the crime were substantiated through victim and witness testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Disposed

    4th Addl District Judge

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    4th Addl District Judge

  5. 24-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    4th Addl District Judge

  6. 22-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    4th Addl District Judge

  7. 16-Apr-2026

    Further Statement

    4th Addl District Judge

  8. 10-Apr-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  9. 08-Apr-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  10. 06-Apr-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  11. 02-Apr-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  12. 30-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  13. 25-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  14. 20-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  15. 17-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  16. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  17. 11-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  18. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  19. 03-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  20. 28-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  21. 25-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  22. 20-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  23. 17-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  24. 13-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  25. 10-Feb-2026

    Framing Of Charge/Plea

    4th Addl District Judge

  26. 02-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 31-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Maheshkumar Urfe Lalo Parvatbhai Pateliya Court Decision: The accused was convicted under IPC Sections 376(1)(i) and 76 (read together) and acquitted of charges under SC/ST (Atrocities Prevention) Act provisions. The victim's minority at time of offense could not be proven beyond doubt. Key Facts: On December 2, 2025, the accused allegedly attempted to sexually assault a minor girl near her village bus stand. The prosecution failed to conclusively establish the victim's age as being under 18 years at the time, though other elements of the crime were substantiated through victim and witness testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case