Government of Gujarat vs Inayat Ibrahim Ishakani Advocate - D K SONDARVA — 768/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 03rd April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJPB040009012025
Filing Number
768/2025
Filing Date
15-11-2025
Registration No
768/2025
Registration Date
15-11-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT-KUTIYANA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.
Decision Date
03rd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
590
Police Station
KUTIYANA POLICE STATION - PORBANDAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Inayat Ibrahim Ishakani Advocate - D K SONDARVA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 03-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 11-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 05-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 06-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary Case: Criminal Case No. 768/2025, Kutiana Court, Gujarat Decision: The court acquitted the accused under IPC Sections 281 and 336 (rash or negligent driving endangering human life), finding the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted insufficient independent witness corroboration, inconsistencies in investigation, and lack of objective evidence regarding vehicle speed and accident circumstances, thus granting the benefit of doubt to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary Case: Criminal Case No. 768/2025, Kutiana Court, Gujarat Decision: The court acquitted the accused under IPC Sections 281 and 336 (rash or negligent driving endangering human life), finding the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted insufficient independent witness corroboration, inconsistencies in investigation, and lack of objective evidence regarding vehicle speed and accident circumstances, thus granting the benefit of doubt to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts