Government of Gujarat vs Inayat Ibrahim Ishakani Advocate - D K SONDARVA — 768/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 03rd April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJPB040009012025
Filing Number
768/2025
Filing Date
15-Nov-2025
Registration No
768/2025
Registration Date
15-Nov-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT-KUTIYANA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
Decision Date
03-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 15-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
590
Police Station
KUTIYANA POLICE STATION - PORBANDAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Inayat Ibrahim Ishakani Advocate - D K SONDARVA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
03-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Court Decision Summary Case: Criminal Case No. 768/2025, Kutiana Court, Gujarat Decision: The court acquitted the accused under IPC Sections 281 and 336 (rash or negligent driving endangering human life), finding the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted insufficient independent witness corroboration, inconsistencies in investigation, and lack of objective evidence regarding vehicle speed and accident circumstances, thus granting the benefit of doubt to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
24-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
11-Mar-2026
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
05-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
06-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.
-
09-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 768/2025
Court Decision Summary Case: Criminal Case No. 768/2025, Kutiana Court, Gujarat Decision: The court acquitted the accused under IPC Sections 281 and 336 (rash or negligent driving endangering human life), finding the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted insufficient independent witness corroboration, inconsistencies in investigation, and lack of objective evidence regarding vehicle speed and accident circumstances, thus granting the benefit of doubt to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts