Government of Gujarat vs Inayat Ibrahim Ishakani Advocate - D K SONDARVA — 768/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 03rd April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJPB040009012025

Case disposed

Filing Number

768/2025

Filing Date

15-11-2025

Registration No

768/2025

Registration Date

15-11-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT-KUTIYANA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.

Decision Date

03rd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

590

Police Station

KUTIYANA POLICE STATION - PORBANDAR DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 281
MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 184

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Inayat Ibrahim Ishakani Advocate - D K SONDARVA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.

03-04-2026

Disposed

24-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

11-03-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

05-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

06-01-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

03-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Court Decision Summary Case: Criminal Case No. 768/2025, Kutiana Court, Gujarat Decision: The court acquitted the accused under IPC Sections 281 and 336 (rash or negligent driving endangering human life), finding the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted insufficient independent witness corroboration, inconsistencies in investigation, and lack of objective evidence regarding vehicle speed and accident circumstances, thus granting the benefit of doubt to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary Case: Criminal Case No. 768/2025, Kutiana Court, Gujarat Decision: The court acquitted the accused under IPC Sections 281 and 336 (rash or negligent driving endangering human life), finding the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted insufficient independent witness corroboration, inconsistencies in investigation, and lack of objective evidence regarding vehicle speed and accident circumstances, thus granting the benefit of doubt to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT-KUTIYANA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case