Government of Gujarat vs Meraman Bhikhu Bhetariya Advocate - D K SONDARVA — 745/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 03rd April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJPB040008752025

Case disposed

Filing Number

745/2025

Filing Date

12-11-2025

Registration No

745/2025

Registration Date

12-11-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT-KUTIYANA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.

Decision Date

03rd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

431

Police Station

KUTIYANA POLICE STATION - PORBANDAR DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 281
MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 184,181

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Meraman Bhikhu Bhetariya Advocate - D K SONDARVA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.

03-04-2026

Disposed

24-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

11-03-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

05-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

06-01-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

03-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The court acquitted the accused of charges under IPC Sections 281 and 337/338 due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to establish a credible case, as witness testimonies were contradictory, key details about the incident (vehicle speed, time, location specifics) were not properly documented, and the investigating officer provided no corroborating evidence. Applying the benefit of doubt principle, the court found no conclusive proof of the accused's guilt and ordered acquittal under CrPC Section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted the accused of charges under IPC Sections 281 and 337/338 due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to establish a credible case, as witness testimonies were contradictory, key details about the incident (vehicle speed, time, location specifics) were not properly documented, and the investigating officer provided no corroborating evidence. Applying the benefit of doubt principle, the court found no conclusive proof of the accused's guilt and ordered acquittal under CrPC Section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT-KUTIYANA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case