Government of Gujarat vs SADAMHUSAIN HARUNBHAI GABOL Advocate - K G MEHTA — 601/2024
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 124. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 24th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJPB040008172024
Filing Number
601/2024
Filing Date
03-12-2024
Registration No
601/2024
Registration Date
03-12-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT-KUTIYANA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
SADAMHUSAIN HARUNBHAI GABOL Advocate - K G MEHTA
AVESH KASAMBHAI MALANG
Adv. K G MEHTA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.
Disposed
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 10-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 04-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 05-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted the accused of charges under IPC Section 124 (theft of mobile phones) as the prosecution failed to conclusively prove the case despite presenting witness testimonies and documentary evidence. The court found insufficient evidence that the accused possessed the stolen mobile devices and determined the investigating officer's evidence lacked independent corroboration, resulting in their discharge under Section 278(1) CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted the accused of charges under IPC Section 124 (theft of mobile phones) as the prosecution failed to conclusively prove the case despite presenting witness testimonies and documentary evidence. The court found insufficient evidence that the accused possessed the stolen mobile devices and determined the investigating officer's evidence lacked independent corroboration, resulting in their discharge under Section 278(1) CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts