Government of Gujarat vs SADAMHUSAIN HARUNBHAI GABOL Advocate - K G MEHTA — 601/2024

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 124. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJPB040008172024

Filing Number

601/2024

Filing Date

03-Dec-2024

Registration No

601/2024

Registration Date

03-Dec-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT-KUTIYANA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 15-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 124

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SADAMHUSAIN HARUNBHAI GABOL Advocate - K G MEHTA

  2. 2.AVESH KASAMBHAI MALANG

    Adv. K G MEHTA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The court acquitted the accused of charges under IPC Section 124 (theft of mobile phones) as the prosecution failed to conclusively prove the case despite presenting witness testimonies and documentary evidence. The court found insufficient evidence that the accused possessed the stolen mobile devices and determined the investigating officer's evidence lacked independent corroboration, resulting in their discharge under Section 278(1) CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  6. 04-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  7. 05-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  8. 08-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  9. 11-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  10. 07-Oct-2025

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  11. 10-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  12. 14-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  13. 25-Jul-2025

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  14. 03-Jul-2025

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  15. 17-Jun-2025

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  16. 31-May-2025

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  17. 21-May-2025

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  18. 15-May-2025

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  19. 07-May-2025

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  20. 30-Apr-2025

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  21. 25-Apr-2025

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  22. 02-Apr-2025

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  23. 18-Mar-2025

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  24. 24-Feb-2025

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  25. 04-Feb-2025

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  26. 24-Jan-2025

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  27. 03-Jan-2025

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  28. 18-Dec-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 03-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 601/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted the accused of charges under IPC Section 124 (theft of mobile phones) as the prosecution failed to conclusively prove the case despite presenting witness testimonies and documentary evidence. The court found insufficient evidence that the accused possessed the stolen mobile devices and determined the investigating officer's evidence lacked independent corroboration, resulting in their discharge under Section 278(1) CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case