Government of Gujarat vs MUKESH AJUBHAI GOHEL Advocate - D K SONDARVA — 684/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 03rd April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJPB040008002025

Case disposed

Filing Number

684/2025

Filing Date

07-10-2025

Registration No

684/2025

Registration Date

07-10-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT-KUTIYANA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.

Decision Date

03rd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

523

Police Station

KUTIYANA POLICE STATION - PORBANDAR DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 281
MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 181

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

MUKESH AJUBHAI GOHEL Advocate - D K SONDARVA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.

03-04-2026

Disposed

02-04-2026

JUDGEMENT

24-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

11-03-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

05-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

03-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The court acquitted the accused of charges under IPC Section 281 and MV Act Section 181, finding insufficient evidence to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The prosecution failed to establish independent, reliable witness testimony and could not adequately corroborate the allegations regarding rash/negligent driving without a valid license. The court noted that the case against the accused cannot be sustained without substantial corroborating evidence from neutral witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted the accused of charges under IPC Section 281 and MV Act Section 181, finding insufficient evidence to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The prosecution failed to establish independent, reliable witness testimony and could not adequately corroborate the allegations regarding rash/negligent driving without a valid license. The court noted that the case against the accused cannot be sustained without substantial corroborating evidence from neutral witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT-KUTIYANA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case