Government of Gujarat vs HASAM AAMADBHAI PADHIYAR Advocate - D A ZEHRI — 477/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 11th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJPB040005642025

Case disposed

Filing Number

477/2025

Filing Date

15-07-2025

Registration No

477/2025

Registration Date

15-07-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT-KUTIYANA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

303

Police Station

KUTIYANA POLICE STATION - PORBANDAR DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 281
MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 184

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

HASAM AAMADBHAI PADHIYAR Advocate - D A ZEHRI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.

11-03-2026

Disposed

02-03-2026

WARRANT OF ARREST

28-01-2026

WARRANT OF ARREST

12-01-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

12-12-2025

WARRANT OF ARREST

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary of Court Decision The court acquitted the accused of charges under IPC Section 281 and MV Act Section 184, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. Despite evidence of rash or negligent driving, the court held that the independent and impartial witnesses did not adequately support the prosecution's narrative, and inconsistencies in the investigation records undermined the case's credibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Court Decision The court acquitted the accused of charges under IPC Section 281 and MV Act Section 184, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. Despite evidence of rash or negligent driving, the court held that the independent and impartial witnesses did not adequately support the prosecution's narrative, and inconsistencies in the investigation records undermined the case's credibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT-KUTIYANA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case