Government of Gujarat vs KANA HAJABHAI MUCHHAR Advocate - D K SONDARVA — 431/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 11th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJPB040005072025
Filing Number
431/2025
Filing Date
23-06-2025
Registration No
431/2025
Registration Date
23-06-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT-KUTIYANA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
145
Police Station
KUTIYANA POLICE STATION - PORBANDAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
KANA HAJABHAI MUCHHAR Advocate - D K SONDARVA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.
Disposed
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 04-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 06-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 09-12-2025 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Gujarat High Court acquitted the accused of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(A) for illegal possession of country-made liquor, finding insufficient evidence and lack of credible independent witnesses to corroborate the prosecution's case. The court held that the prosecution failed to discharge its burden of proof beyond reasonable doubt, as the witnesses presented lacked impartiality and the circumstantial evidence was weak. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Gujarat High Court acquitted the accused of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(A) for illegal possession of country-made liquor, finding insufficient evidence and lack of credible independent witnesses to corroborate the prosecution's case. The court held that the prosecution failed to discharge its burden of proof beyond reasonable doubt, as the witnesses presented lacked impartiality and the circumstantial evidence was weak. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts