Government of Gujarat vs Ram Kanabhai Gangadiya Advocate - S P LAKHALANI — 182/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 18th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJPB040002142026

Filing Number

182/2026

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Registration No

182/2026

Registration Date

17-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT-KUTIYANA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

Decision Date

18-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

140

Police Station

KUTIYANA POLICE STATION - PORBANDAR DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185,181

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ram Kanabhai Gangadiya Advocate - S P LAKHALANI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Apr-2026

    Order

    The court convicted the accused Ram Kanabhai Gangadiya under IPC Sections 66(1)(b) and MV Act Sections 185 and 191 for voluntary guilty plea to charges of driving under the influence and providing false information. Considering the accused's age, economic condition, and circumstances, the court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 2,800 and, in default, three days simple imprisonment, while also issuing orders regarding a seized vehicle. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 182/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused Ram Kanabhai Gangadiya under IPC Sections 66(1)(b) and MV Act Sections 185 and 191 for voluntary guilty plea to charges of driving under the influence and providing false information. Considering the accused's age, economic condition, and circumstances, the court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 2,800 and, in default, three days simple imprisonment, while also issuing orders regarding a seized vehicle. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case