Government of Gujarat vs Ram Arjan Daki Advocate - V D JOSHI — 474/2023
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B,85. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 01st April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJPB030006022023
Filing Number
474/2023
Filing Date
24-05-2023
Registration No
474/2023
Registration Date
24-05-2023
Court
TALUKA COURT-RANAVAV
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
156
Police Station
RANAVAV POLICE STATION - PORBANDAR DISTRICT
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Ram Arjan Daki Advocate - V D JOSHI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 11-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 04-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 29-12-2025 | JUDGEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary This is a Gujarat High Court judgment in a criminal case involving charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act. The court acquitted the accused, finding the prosecution's evidence insufficient to prove the alleged offense beyond reasonable doubt. The judgment emphasized that the blood sample was not delivered to the forensic lab within the required seven-day timeframe under Blood Test Rules, thereby breaching procedural safeguards that entitled the accused to the benefit of doubt and acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a Gujarat High Court judgment in a criminal case involving charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act. The court acquitted the accused, finding the prosecution's evidence insufficient to prove the alleged offense beyond reasonable doubt. The judgment emphasized that the blood sample was not delivered to the forensic lab within the required seven-day timeframe under Blood Test Rules, thereby breaching procedural safeguards that entitled the accused to the benefit of doubt and acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts