RAMBHAI NATHUBHAI VAGHELA vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 47/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 27th March 2026.

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJPB030001972026

Case disposed

Filing Number

47/2026

Filing Date

27-02-2026

Registration No

47/2026

Registration Date

27-02-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT-RANAVAV

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

27th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

115

Police Station

RANAVAV POLICE STATION - PORBANDAR DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 497

Petitioner(s)

RAMBHAI NATHUBHAI VAGHELA

Adv. M A MANGHERA

Respondent(s)

Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

27-03-2026

Disposed

24-03-2026

ORDER/JUDGEMENT

11-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT

02-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT

Final Orders / Judgements

27-03-2026
ORDER

Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate Court in Rajnandgaon dismissed the petitioner's interim application seeking recovery of a mobile phone (Y-17S model) allegedly seized by police during a cruelty case investigation. The court found that no mobile phone was actually seized by police in the case and that the petitioner failed to produce documentary evidence (bill/warranty card) proving ownership, hence the interim relief application was rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate Court in Rajnandgaon dismissed the petitioner's interim application seeking recovery of a mobile phone (Y-17S model) allegedly seized by police during a cruelty case investigation. The court found that no mobile phone was actually seized by police in the case and that the petitioner failed to produce documentary evidence (bill/warranty card) proving ownership, hence the interim relief application was rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT-RANAVAV All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case