NAGJIBHAI urfe NAGABHAI VISABHAI PANDAVADRA Heirs SOMABHAI NAGJIBHAI PANDAVADARA vs BIJALBHAI RAJABHAI CHUDASAMA — 3/2026

Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34. Status: For Rejoinder. Next hearing: 14th July 2026.

For Rejoinder Next hearing 14-Jul-2026 this date has passed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJPB030000462026

Filing Number

3/2026

Filing Date

29-Jan-2026

Registration No

3/2026

Registration Date

29-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT-RANAVAV

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NAGJIBHAI urfe NAGABHAI VISABHAI PANDAVADRA Heirs SOMABHAI NAGJIBHAI PANDAVADARA

    Adv. M A MANGHERA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BIJALBHAI RAJABHAI CHUDASAMA

  2. 2.RAMESHBHAI BIJALBHAI CHUDASAMA

    Adv. D B TARKHALA

  3. 3.KARABHAI VASTABHAI LIMBOLA Heirs VALJIBHAI KARABHAI LIMBOLA

    Adv. D B TARKHALA

Case History

  1. 14-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Jun-2026

    For Rejoinder

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  3. 23-Jun-2026

    For Rejoinder

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 08-Jun-2026

    For Rejoinder

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 29-May-2026

    Order

    Case Summary: R.C.S.NO.03-2026 Court: Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ranaghat, Gujarat Petitioner(s): Nagjibhai urfe Nagabhai Visabhai Pandavadra and Heirs of Somabhai Nagjibhai Pandavadara Respondent(s): Bijalbhai Rajabhai Chudasama, Rameshbhai Bijalbhai Chudasama, Karabhai Vastabhai Limbola, and Heirs of Valjibhai Karabhai Limbola Outcome: The plaintiff's suit for property declaration was dismissed under CPC Order VII, Rule 11. The court found the claim was barred by the law of limitation (3-year period under Limitation Act, 1963, Article 58) and rejected on grounds that the property had been sold by the petitioner's father in 1965, and the defendants had held possession and paid all property taxes for over 50 years. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 29-May-2026

    For Rejoinder

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 21-May-2026

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 16-May-2026

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 14-May-2026

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 13-May-2026

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 06-May-2026

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 02-May-2026

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 21-Apr-2026

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 24-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 28-Feb-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 29-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  17. 29-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: R.C.S.NO.03-2026 Court: Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ranaghat, Gujarat Petitioner(s): Nagjibhai urfe Nagabhai Visabhai Pandavadra and Heirs of Somabhai Nagjibhai Pandavadara Respondent(s): Bijalbhai Rajabhai Chudasama, Rameshbhai Bijalbhai Chudasama, Karabhai Vastabhai Limbola, and Heirs of Valjibhai Karabhai Limbola Outcome: The plaintiff's suit for property declaration was dismissed under CPC Order VII, Rule 11. The court found the claim was barred by the law of limitation (3-year period under Limitation Act, 1963, Article 58) and rejected on grounds that the property had been sold by the petitioner's father in 1965, and the defendants had held possession and paid all property taxes for over 50 years. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case