Aavesh Kasambhai Malang vs Life Style Mobile Advocate - J M CHAVDA — 5960/2022
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,141. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 21st April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJPB020067152022
Filing Number
5960/2022
Filing Date
03-Dec-2022
Registration No
5960/2022
Registration Date
03-Dec-2022
Court
CIVIL COURT PORBANDAR
Judge
5-2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
21-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION
Last updated 15-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Aavesh Kasambhai Malang
Adv. B B LAKHANI
Respondent(s)
-
1.Life Style Mobile Advocate - J M CHAVDA
-
2.Abdulkadar Harun Giga Owner of Life Style Mobile
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
21-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary The court found the accused guilty under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonored cheque for Rs. 8,00,000. The complainant lent money to the accused, who provided a cheque as repayment that was returned due to insufficient funds; the accused failed to pay despite receiving legal notice within the prescribed 15-day period. The court sentenced the accused to one year simple imprisonment and ordered him to pay Rs. 8,00,000 compensation to the complainant within 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Apr-2026
Disposed
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
20-Apr-2026
Judgement
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
08-Apr-2026
Judgement
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
24-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
11-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
25-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
11-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
27-Jan-2026
Final Arguments
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
31-Dec-2025
Final Arguments
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
09-Dec-2025
Final Arguments
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
19-Nov-2025
Final Arguments
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
29-Oct-2025
Further Statement
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
24-Sep-2025
Further Statement
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
20-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Complainant
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
29-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Complainant
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
23-Jun-2025
Evidence Of Complainant
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
04-Jun-2025
Further Statement
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
26-May-2025
Further Statement
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
23-Apr-2025
Further Statement
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
19-Feb-2025
Further Statement
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
07-Dec-2024
Further Statement
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
25-Oct-2024
Further Statement
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
31-Jul-2024
Further Statement
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
08-Jul-2024
Further Statement
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
27-May-2024
Evidence Of Complainant
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
22-Apr-2024
Evidence Of Complainant
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
28-Feb-2024
Evidence Of Complainant
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
19-Jan-2024
Warrant Of Arrest
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
13-Dec-2023
Warrant Of Arrest
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
25-Oct-2023
Warrant Of Arrest
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
13-Sep-2023
Evidence Of Complainant
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
25-Jul-2023
Evidence Of Complainant
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
12-Jun-2023
Evidence Of Complainant
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
09-May-2023
Warrant Of Arrest
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
11-Apr-2023
Plea
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
13-Mar-2023
Plea
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
18-Jan-2023
Plea
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Dec-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Dec-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 5960/2022
Summary The court found the accused guilty under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonored cheque for Rs. 8,00,000. The complainant lent money to the accused, who provided a cheque as repayment that was returned due to insufficient funds; the accused failed to pay despite receiving legal notice within the prescribed 15-day period. The court sentenced the accused to one year simple imprisonment and ordered him to pay Rs. 8,00,000 compensation to the complainant within 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts