The State of Gujarat vs anil savjibhai dhokiya Advocate - D M RUPARELIYA, G K SADIYA — 2989/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498A,323,504,114. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 13th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJPB020039052025
e-Filing Number
01-04-2025
Filing Number
2989/2025
Filing Date
29-Jul-2025
Registration No
2989/2025
Registration Date
29-Jul-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT PORBANDAR
Judge
5-2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 31-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
27
Police Station
MADHAVPUR POLICE STATION - PORBANDAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The State of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.anil savjibhai dhokiya Advocate - D M RUPARELIYA, G K SADIYA
-
2.manjulaben w o savjibhai dhokiya
Adv. D M RUPARELIYA
-
3.krunalbhai savjibhai dhokiya
Adv. D M RUPARELIYA
-
4.khusbuben w o krunalbhai savjibhai dhokiya
Adv. D M RUPARELIYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: CC 2989/2025 Court Decision: The court acquitted all defendants of charges under IPC sections 498(A), 323, 504, and 114. Key Reasoning: The court found that while the complainant alleged domestic cruelty and harassment by her husband and in-laws, the prosecution failed to establish the essential elements required under IPC 498(A). Specifically, the court determined that the alleged cruelty was not proven to be "incessant, persistent and unbearable," nor was there evidence it was intended to force the woman to commit suicide or fulfill unlawful demands for dowry. The court noted the complainant filed the complaint approximately 3 years after leaving her marital home and that her own testimony revealed she sought the FIR primarily to recover dowry and household items, not due to ongoing domestic violence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
28-Feb-2026
Judgement
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
21-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
13-Feb-2026
Further Statement
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
23-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
20-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
21-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
10-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
20-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
29-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
29-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 2989/2025
Case Summary: CC 2989/2025 Court Decision: The court acquitted all defendants of charges under IPC sections 498(A), 323, 504, and 114. Key Reasoning: The court found that while the complainant alleged domestic cruelty and harassment by her husband and in-laws, the prosecution failed to establish the essential elements required under IPC 498(A). Specifically, the court determined that the alleged cruelty was not proven to be "incessant, persistent and unbearable," nor was there evidence it was intended to force the woman to commit suicide or fulfill unlawful demands for dowry. The court noted the complainant filed the complaint approximately 3 years after leaving her marital home and that her own testimony revealed she sought the FIR primarily to recover dowry and household items, not due to ongoing domestic violence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts