Anil Dhaneshvar Jesval vs Babulal Dhanjibhai Chamundiya Advocate - R R ODEDRA — 358/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 142. Disposed: Contested--CONVERTED TO on 13th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJPB020023202025
Filing Number
358/2025
Filing Date
14-May-2025
Registration No
358/2025
Registration Date
14-May-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT PORBANDAR
Judge
1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--CONVERTED TO
Last updated 31-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Anil Dhaneshvar Jesval
Adv. H H BUKHARI
Respondent(s)
-
1.Babulal Dhanjibhai Chamundiya Advocate - R R ODEDRA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court dismissed the petitioner's application, finding that the respondent advocate had satisfactorily resolved the dispute before the court. The court ordered the defect in the case to be rectified and directed registration of the proceedings under the relevant case number, while directing the respondent to submit necessary compliance details within the prescribed timeframe. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing P.P.
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
10-Feb-2026
Process To Opponent
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
07-Jan-2026
Process To Opponent
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
22-Dec-2025
Process To Opponent
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
15-Nov-2025
Process To Opponent
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
03-Nov-2025
Process To Opponent
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
08-Sep-2025
Process To Opponent
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
26-Aug-2025
Process To Opponent
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
06-Aug-2025
Process To Opponent
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
02-Jul-2025
Process To Opponent
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
16-Jun-2025
Process To Opponent
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
14-May-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-May-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 358/2025
The court dismissed the petitioner's application, finding that the respondent advocate had satisfactorily resolved the dispute before the court. The court ordered the defect in the case to be rectified and directed registration of the proceedings under the relevant case number, while directing the respondent to submit necessary compliance details within the prescribed timeframe. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts