The State of Gujarat vs raju bhikhubhai chundavadara Advocate - D R MODHVADIYA — 1071/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 01st May 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJPB020013882026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

23-12-2025

Filing Number

1071/2026

Filing Date

07-03-2026

Registration No

1071/2026

Registration Date

07-03-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT PORBANDAR

Judge

5-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

01st May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

736

Police Station

BAGVADAR POLICE STATION - PORBANDAR DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) POLICE ACT, 1951 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

The State of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

raju bhikhubhai chundavadara Advocate - D R MODHVADIYA

Hearing History

Judge: 5-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

01-05-2026

Disposed

28-04-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

27-04-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

21-04-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

17-04-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

01-05-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: Criminal Case 1071/2026 Court Decision: The accused Raju Bhikhubhai Chundavadara was acquitted under IPC Section 271(1) and discharged of charges under the Gujarat Police Act, Section 135 (illegal possession of weapons in violation of an arms prohibition order). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was carrying a prohibited iron dagger on the specified date and location. Key Reasoning: The court determined the prosecution's case relied entirely on an unsubstantiated seizure memo (panchayat document) and police testimony. The independent witnesses (panchs) who allegedly witnessed the seizure retracted their support for the prosecution's account during cross-examination, creating reasonable doubt about the arrest's authenticity and the weapon's recovery. Absence of corroborating independent evidence and procedural deficiencies rendered the prosecution unable to establish all essential elements of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Case 1071/2026 Court Decision: The accused Raju Bhikhubhai Chundavadara was acquitted under IPC Section 271(1) and discharged of charges under the Gujarat Police Act, Section 135 (illegal possession of weapons in violation of an arms prohibition order). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was carrying a prohibited iron dagger on the specified date and location. Key Reasoning: The court determined the prosecution's case relied entirely on an unsubstantiated seizure memo (panchayat document) and police testimony. The independent witnesses (panchs) who allegedly witnessed the seizure retracted their support for the prosecution's account during cross-examination, creating reasonable doubt about the arrest's authenticity and the weapon's recovery. Absence of corroborating independent evidence and procedural deficiencies rendered the prosecution unable to establish all essential elements of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CIVIL COURT PORBANDAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case