The State of Gujarat vs Nilesh alias bavo Madhurbhai Tukadiya — 1009/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJPB020013202026

Filing Number

1009/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

1009/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT PORBANDAR

Judge

2-Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

518

Police Station

HARBOUR MARINE POLICE STATION- PORBANDAR DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185,181

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Nilesh alias bavo Madhurbhai Tukadiya

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Porbandar convicted Nilesh alias Bavo Madhurbhai Tukadiya under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 66(1)B and IPC Sections 185, 3, and 181, after he voluntarily pleaded guilty to the charges. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 4,500 or, in default, undergo simple imprisonment for 15 days, and ordered appropriate disposition of seized contraband materials. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1009/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Porbandar convicted Nilesh alias Bavo Madhurbhai Tukadiya under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 66(1)B and IPC Sections 185, 3, and 181, after he voluntarily pleaded guilty to the charges. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 4,500 or, in default, undergo simple imprisonment for 15 days, and ordered appropriate disposition of seized contraband materials. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case