The State of Gujarat vs narshi karabhai paramar Advocate - D R MODHVADIYA — 977/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 17th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJPB020012882026
e-Filing Number
03-01-2026
Filing Number
977/2026
Filing Date
06-03-2026
Registration No
977/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
CIVIL COURT PORBANDAR
Judge
5-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
771
Police Station
BAGVADAR POLICE STATION - PORBANDAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
narshi karabhai paramar Advocate - D R MODHVADIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 5-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 13-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Criminal Case 977/2026 Court Decision: The accused Narshi Karabhai Paramar was acquitted of charges under Gujarat Police Act Section 135 (illegal weapon possession). Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Critical weaknesses included: (1) the two panch witnesses categorically denied the prosecution's account and refuted the seizure memo details; (2) no independent witnesses corroborated the police narrative; (3) the alleged weapon recovery was not credibly established; and (4) the prosecution relied solely on interested police officer testimony without supporting corroboration. The court held that without solid evidence linking the accused to the weapon and the alleged breach of the arms prohibition order, the burden of proof beyond reasonable doubt was not discharged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Criminal Case 977/2026 Court Decision: The accused Narshi Karabhai Paramar was acquitted of charges under Gujarat Police Act Section 135 (illegal weapon possession). Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Critical weaknesses included: (1) the two panch witnesses categorically denied the prosecution's account and refuted the seizure memo details; (2) no independent witnesses corroborated the police narrative; (3) the alleged weapon recovery was not credibly established; and (4) the prosecution relied solely on interested police officer testimony without supporting corroboration. The court held that without solid evidence linking the accused to the weapon and the alleged breach of the arms prohibition order, the burden of proof beyond reasonable doubt was not discharged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts