The State of Gujarat vs narshi karabhai paramar Advocate - D R MODHVADIYA — 977/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 17th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJPB020012882026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

03-01-2026

Filing Number

977/2026

Filing Date

06-03-2026

Registration No

977/2026

Registration Date

06-03-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT PORBANDAR

Judge

5-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

17th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

771

Police Station

BAGVADAR POLICE STATION - PORBANDAR DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) POLICE ACT, 1951 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

The State of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

narshi karabhai paramar Advocate - D R MODHVADIYA

Hearing History

Judge: 5-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

17-03-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

13-03-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

06-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

17-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: Criminal Case 977/2026 Court Decision: The accused Narshi Karabhai Paramar was acquitted of charges under Gujarat Police Act Section 135 (illegal weapon possession). Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Critical weaknesses included: (1) the two panch witnesses categorically denied the prosecution's account and refuted the seizure memo details; (2) no independent witnesses corroborated the police narrative; (3) the alleged weapon recovery was not credibly established; and (4) the prosecution relied solely on interested police officer testimony without supporting corroboration. The court held that without solid evidence linking the accused to the weapon and the alleged breach of the arms prohibition order, the burden of proof beyond reasonable doubt was not discharged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Case 977/2026 Court Decision: The accused Narshi Karabhai Paramar was acquitted of charges under Gujarat Police Act Section 135 (illegal weapon possession). Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Critical weaknesses included: (1) the two panch witnesses categorically denied the prosecution's account and refuted the seizure memo details; (2) no independent witnesses corroborated the police narrative; (3) the alleged weapon recovery was not credibly established; and (4) the prosecution relied solely on interested police officer testimony without supporting corroboration. The court held that without solid evidence linking the accused to the weapon and the alleged breach of the arms prohibition order, the burden of proof beyond reasonable doubt was not discharged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CIVIL COURT PORBANDAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case