The State of Gujarat vs narshi karabhai paramar Advocate - D R MODHVADIYA — 977/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJPB020012882026

e-Filing Number

03-01-2026

Filing Number

977/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

977/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT PORBANDAR

Judge

5-2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

771

Police Station

BAGVADAR POLICE STATION - PORBANDAR DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.narshi karabhai paramar Advocate - D R MODHVADIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: Criminal Case 977/2026 Court Decision: The accused Narshi Karabhai Paramar was acquitted of charges under Gujarat Police Act Section 135 (illegal weapon possession). Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Critical weaknesses included: (1) the two panch witnesses categorically denied the prosecution's account and refuted the seizure memo details; (2) no independent witnesses corroborated the police narrative; (3) the alleged weapon recovery was not credibly established; and (4) the prosecution relied solely on interested police officer testimony without supporting corroboration. The court held that without solid evidence linking the accused to the weapon and the alleged breach of the arms prohibition order, the burden of proof beyond reasonable doubt was not discharged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Further Statement

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 977/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Case 977/2026 Court Decision: The accused Narshi Karabhai Paramar was acquitted of charges under Gujarat Police Act Section 135 (illegal weapon possession). Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Critical weaknesses included: (1) the two panch witnesses categorically denied the prosecution's account and refuted the seizure memo details; (2) no independent witnesses corroborated the police narrative; (3) the alleged weapon recovery was not credibly established; and (4) the prosecution relied solely on interested police officer testimony without supporting corroboration. The court held that without solid evidence linking the accused to the weapon and the alleged breach of the arms prohibition order, the burden of proof beyond reasonable doubt was not discharged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case