The State of Gujarat vs Mukesh Devaytbhai Mori — 360/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 Section 12. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJPB020005372026
Filing Number
360/2026
Filing Date
05-Feb-2026
Registration No
360/2026
Registration Date
05-Feb-2026
Court
CIVIL COURT PORBANDAR
Judge
2-Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 15-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11218009260009
Police Station
KAMLABAG B. DIV. POLICE STATION - PORBANDAR DISTRICT
Year
2006
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The State of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Mukesh Devaytbhai Mori
-
2.Bharatsinh Manubha Jethva
-
3.Rama alias Bhabhan Panchabhai Katara
-
4.Bhikhu JIvabhai Makwana
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The Chief Judicial Magistrate convicted four accused persons under Section 12 of the Gujarat Security of Citizens Act, 2023, and sentenced them to a fine of Rs. 200 or two days simple imprisonment in default. The court found the accused guilty of the offense while considering their economic and social circumstances and family responsibilities as mitigating factors. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
03-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
05-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 360/2026
The Chief Judicial Magistrate convicted four accused persons under Section 12 of the Gujarat Security of Citizens Act, 2023, and sentenced them to a fine of Rs. 200 or two days simple imprisonment in default. The court found the accused guilty of the offense while considering their economic and social circumstances and family responsibilities as mitigating factors. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts