Shrikrushna Credit Co.O.Society Through Branch Manager Bhaveshbhai Pravinchandra Raichura vs Harishbhai Devajibhai Gohel Advocate - M G SHINGARKHIYA — 328/2026
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJPB020004962026
Filing Number
328/2026
Filing Date
02-Feb-2026
Registration No
328/2026
Registration Date
02-Feb-2026
Court
CIVIL COURT PORBANDAR
Judge
2-Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Last updated 31-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shrikrushna Credit Co.O.Society Through Branch Manager Bhaveshbhai Pravinchandra Raichura
Adv. D D JOSHI
Respondent(s)
-
1.Harishbhai Devajibhai Gohel Advocate - M G SHINGARKHIYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: 328/2026 The court dismissed the FIR filed by Shrikrushna Credit Co-operative Society against advocate Harishbhai Devajibhai Gohel for lack of prima facie case. The court found that while the complainant alleged criminal breach of trust and violation of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023, the facts presented did not establish the requisite ingredients of the alleged offenses, warranting closure of the criminal prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
27-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
02-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 328/2026
Case Summary: 328/2026 The court dismissed the FIR filed by Shrikrushna Credit Co-operative Society against advocate Harishbhai Devajibhai Gohel for lack of prima facie case. The court found that while the complainant alleged criminal breach of trust and violation of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023, the facts presented did not establish the requisite ingredients of the alleged offenses, warranting closure of the criminal prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts