The State of Gujarat vs Bhagvanji Tulsidas Karia Advocate - A D SURANI, J B RATHOD, J B RATHODB B LAKHANI, — 250/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 336. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJPB020003042025

Filing Number

250/2025

Filing Date

17-Jan-2025

Registration No

250/2025

Registration Date

17-Jan-2025

Court

CIVIL COURT PORBANDAR

Judge

5-2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11218017240119

Police Station

MADHAVPUR POLICE STATION - PORBANDAR DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 336
Gujarat Medical Practitioners Act, 1963 Section 30

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Bhagvanji Tulsidas Karia Advocate - A D SURANI, J B RATHOD, J B RATHODB B LAKHANI,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: FIR 250/2025 Court Decision: The accused, Bhagvanji Tulsidas Karia, was acquitted and discharged of charges under IPC Section 336 and Gujarat Medical Practitioners Act 1963 Section 30 due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused practiced medicine without proper qualifications. Key Reasoning: Despite seizing medicines and equipment worth ₹1,00,808 from the accused's residence, the court found critical evidentiary gaps—no patient testimony of unlicensed treatment, inconsistent witness statements (including contradictions by prosecution witnesses under cross-examination), absence of documented evidence of actual medical practice, and no proof the accused lacked proper credentials to practice Ayurvedic medicine. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    Further Statement

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  7. 21-Feb-2026

    Further Statement

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  8. 23-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  9. 20-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  10. 21-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  11. 17-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  12. 03-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  13. 30-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  14. 29-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  15. 25-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  16. 20-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  17. 21-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  18. 17-Jan-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  19. 17-Jan-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 250/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: FIR 250/2025 Court Decision: The accused, Bhagvanji Tulsidas Karia, was acquitted and discharged of charges under IPC Section 336 and Gujarat Medical Practitioners Act 1963 Section 30 due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused practiced medicine without proper qualifications. Key Reasoning: Despite seizing medicines and equipment worth ₹1,00,808 from the accused's residence, the court found critical evidentiary gaps—no patient testimony of unlicensed treatment, inconsistent witness statements (including contradictions by prosecution witnesses under cross-examination), absence of documented evidence of actual medical practice, and no proof the accused lacked proper credentials to practice Ayurvedic medicine. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case