Rathod Kishor Naran vs Hitesh Pratapbhai Chavada Autho. Gurukrupa Credit co.Op.Society Ltd. Advocate - J R ODEDRA — 181/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: GJPB010016572025

Filing Number

181/2025

Filing Date

22-Dec-2025

Registration No

181/2025

Registration Date

22-Dec-2025

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT PORBANDAR

Judge

2-Addl.district & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 15-May-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rathod Kishor Naran

    Adv. K H GOHEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Hitesh Pratapbhai Chavada Autho. Gurukrupa Credit co.Op.Society Ltd. Advocate - J R ODEDRA

  2. 2.The State of Gujarat

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The court dismissed the appeal and set aside the lower court's conviction order under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appellant was acquitted of the criminal charges related to a dishonored check, as the court found the case met the criteria for compounding under Section 138 NI Act. The settlement record was accepted and the case was disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  5. 22-Jan-2026

    Process To Respondents

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  6. 05-Jan-2026

    Process To Respondents

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  7. 22-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 22-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 181/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court dismissed the appeal and set aside the lower court's conviction order under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appellant was acquitted of the criminal charges related to a dishonored check, as the court found the case met the criteria for compounding under Section 138 NI Act. The settlement record was accepted and the case was disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case