Shankar Kanjibhai Parmar vs Bimabhai Vikrambhai Bokhiriya Advocate - P R APARNATHI — 172/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: GJPB010016002025

Case disposed

Filing Number

172/2025

Filing Date

10-12-2025

Registration No

172/2025

Registration Date

10-12-2025

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT PORBANDAR

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 415
NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

Shankar Kanjibhai Parmar

Adv. J D SALET

Respondent(s)

Bimabhai Vikrambhai Bokhiriya Advocate - P R APARNATHI

The State of Gujarat

Adv. S B JETHWA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

14-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS

16-02-2026

PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS

12-01-2026

PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS

08-01-2026

PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

The court set aside the conviction and one-year sentence imposed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, following a compromise settlement reached between the appellant and complainant at the National Lok Adalat. The court relied on Supreme Court precedent establishing that Section 138 cases are primarily compensatory in nature and that compounding at later stages is permissible when appropriate compensation is agreed upon by both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

10-12-2025
ORDER
casestatus.in Summary

The court set aside the conviction and one-year sentence imposed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, following a compromise settlement reached between the appellant and complainant at the National Lok Adalat. The court relied on Supreme Court precedent establishing that Section 138 cases are primarily compensatory in nature and that compounding at later stages is permissible when appropriate compensation is agreed upon by both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT PORBANDAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case