Jamnaben Devjibhai Sukhdiya vs Navik Sarvoday Sahakari Mandali Ltd Through Manager Pratapbhai Amrutlal Chauhan Advocate - H B KOTECHA — 171/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: GJPB010015912025
Filing Number
171/2025
Filing Date
09-12-2025
Registration No
171/2025
Registration Date
09-12-2025
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT PORBANDAR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Jamnaben Devjibhai Sukhdiya
Adv. M P POSTARIA
Respondent(s)
Navik Sarvoday Sahakari Mandali Ltd Through Manager Pratapbhai Amrutlal Chauhan Advocate - H B KOTECHA
The State of Gujarat
Adv. S B JETHWA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Disposed
FINAL HEARING
FINAL HEARING
FINAL HEARING
PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | FINAL HEARING |
| 09-03-2026 | FINAL HEARING |
| 09-02-2026 | FINAL HEARING |
| 12-01-2026 | PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Criminal Appeal No. 171/2025 The court set aside the conviction and sentence of appellant Jamnaben Devjibhai Sukhdiya under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act (one year imprisonment and Rs.10,00,000 compensation) after the parties reached an out-of-court settlement. The appellant agreed to pay Rs.1,65,917 already deposited plus Rs.10,34,083 within 10 months, with her mortgaged shop to be returned upon full payment. The court disposed of the appeal based on the compromise, noting that Section 138's primary objective is compensatory rather than punitive, and settlement can be encouraged even at appellate stages with appropriate compensation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Criminal Appeal No. 171/2025 The court set aside the conviction and sentence of appellant Jamnaben Devjibhai Sukhdiya under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act (one year imprisonment and Rs.10,00,000 compensation) after the parties reached an out-of-court settlement. The appellant agreed to pay Rs.1,65,917 already deposited plus Rs.10,34,083 within 10 months, with her mortgaged shop to be returned upon full payment. The court disposed of the appeal based on the compromise, noting that Section 138's primary objective is compensatory rather than punitive, and settlement can be encouraged even at appellate stages with appropriate compensation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts