Vanraj Viram Odedra vs The State of Gujarat — 161/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: GJPB010015752025

Filing Number

161/2025

Filing Date

06-Dec-2025

Registration No

161/2025

Registration Date

06-Dec-2025

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT PORBANDAR

Judge

2-Addl.district & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 15-May-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vanraj Viram Odedra

    Adv. V G PARMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Gujarat

  2. 2.Shriram Transport Finance Co.Ltd Authorised Officer Hiren Amrutlal Thanki

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court allowed the settlement petition filed by both parties under Section 89(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The appellant was acquitted of charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act after a compromise was reached, with the respondent recovering the requisite amount from the appellant. The court's primary intent was to preserve social harmony through settlement while disposing of the criminal appeal accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  5. 21-Feb-2026

    Final Hearing

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  6. 29-Jan-2026

    Final Hearing

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  7. 13-Jan-2026

    Final Hearing

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  8. 16-Dec-2025

    For R&P

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  9. 15-Dec-2025

    Process To Respondents

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  10. 06-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 06-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 161/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the settlement petition filed by both parties under Section 89(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The appellant was acquitted of charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act after a compromise was reached, with the respondent recovering the requisite amount from the appellant. The court's primary intent was to preserve social harmony through settlement while disposing of the criminal appeal accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case