Safiya Nurmohmad Dufani vs xxxx — 89/2025
Case under Mental Health Act, 1987 Section 52,53,54. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 29th April 2026.
CMA DC - CIVIL MISC. APPLICATION - DISTRICT COURT
CNR: GJPB010015442025
Filing Number
89/2025
Filing Date
01-Dec-2025
Registration No
89/2025
Registration Date
01-Dec-2025
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT PORBANDAR
Judge
2-Addl.district & Sessions Judge
Decision Date
29-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Last updated 31-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Safiya Nurmohmad Dufani
Adv. S A SARVANI
Respondent(s)
-
1.xxxx
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
29-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: CMA-DC No. 89/2025 The Porbandar Additional District Court granted Safiya Nurmohmad Dufani's petition to be appointed as guardian of her brother Ahmad Nurmohmad Dufani, who is mentally and physically disabled (Spastic cerebral palsy with mental retardation). The court found that Ahmad is unable to manage his own affairs or property and lacks the capacity to care for himself, making guardianship necessary for his welfare and that of the shared ancestral property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-Apr-2026
Disposed
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
24-Apr-2026
Order
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
18-Apr-2026
Public Notice
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
10-Apr-2026
Public Notice
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Public Notice
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
13-Feb-2026
Public Notice
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
16-Jan-2026
Public Notice
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
01-Jan-2026
Public Notice
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
01-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 89/2025
Case Summary: CMA-DC No. 89/2025 The Porbandar Additional District Court granted Safiya Nurmohmad Dufani's petition to be appointed as guardian of her brother Ahmad Nurmohmad Dufani, who is mentally and physically disabled (Spastic cerebral palsy with mental retardation). The court found that Ahmad is unable to manage his own affairs or property and lacks the capacity to care for himself, making guardianship necessary for his welfare and that of the shared ancestral property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts