Maldebhai Sarmanbhai Odedra vs Bachubhai Bijalbhai Chhanga Owner GJ-12-AT8498 Advocate - EX PARTY — 27/2024

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 164. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

MACP - MAC PETITION

CNR: GJPB010015442024

Filing Number

27/2024

Filing Date

11-Dec-2024

Registration No

27/2024

Registration Date

11-Dec-2024

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT PORBANDAR

Judge

1-Principal District & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 31-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 164

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Maldebhai Sarmanbhai Odedra

    Adv. N S RATIYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Bachubhai Bijalbhai Chhanga Owner GJ-12-AT8498 Advocate - EX PARTY

  2. 2.Ifcotokyo General Insurance Co. Ltd

    Adv. N D KAKKAD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary of MACP/27/2024 The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Porbandar disposed of the case through a compromise settlement reached at National Lok Adalat. IFFCO-TOKIO General Insurance Co. Ltd. was ordered to pay Rs. 2,25,000 as final compensation to petitioner Maldebhai Sarmanbhai Odedra within 3 months via bank deposit. The amount is to be split 50-50: half invested in a 5-year fixed deposit and half paid directly to the applicant, with no tax deduction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  6. 13-Feb-2026

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  7. 30-Jan-2026

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  8. 16-Jan-2026

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  9. 19-Dec-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  10. 05-Dec-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  11. 12-Nov-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  12. 07-Nov-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  13. 10-Oct-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  14. 26-Sep-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  15. 12-Sep-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  16. 01-Aug-2025

    Process To Opponent

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  17. 25-Jul-2025

    Process To Opponent

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  18. 11-Jul-2025

    Process To Opponent

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  19. 05-Jul-2025

    Process To Opponent

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  20. 21-Jun-2025

    Process To Opponent

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  21. 25-Apr-2025

    Process To Opponent

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  22. 18-Apr-2025

    Process To Opponent

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  23. 05-Apr-2025

    Process To Opponent

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  24. 01-Mar-2025

    Process To Opponent

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  25. 01-Feb-2025

    Process To Opponent

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  26. 18-Jan-2025

    Process To Opponent

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  27. 26-Dec-2024

    Process To Opponent

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  28. 11-Dec-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 11-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 27/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of MACP/27/2024 The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Porbandar disposed of the case through a compromise settlement reached at National Lok Adalat. IFFCO-TOKIO General Insurance Co. Ltd. was ordered to pay Rs. 2,25,000 as final compensation to petitioner Maldebhai Sarmanbhai Odedra within 3 months via bank deposit. The amount is to be split 50-50: half invested in a 5-year fixed deposit and half paid directly to the applicant, with no tax deduction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case