The State of Gujarat vs Anupam Alias Badal Son of Bilas Son of Ganesh Pasvan Advocate - V G PARMAR — 26/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 363,366,376,506(2),114. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 01st April 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

PCSO - SPECIAL CASE - PCSO

CNR: GJPB010013352025

Filing Number

26/2025

Filing Date

16-Oct-2025

Registration No

26/2025

Registration Date

16-Oct-2025

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT PORBANDAR

Judge

2-Addl.district & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

47

Police Station

KUTIYANA POLICE STATION - PORBANDAR DISTRICT

Year

2015

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 363,366,376,506(2),114
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 Section 4,6,8

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Anupam Alias Badal Son of Bilas Son of Ganesh Pasvan Advocate - V G PARMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    The court acquitted both accused persons of charges under the Indian Penal Code sections 363, 366, 376, 506(2), 114 and POCSO Act sections 4, 6, 8, finding insufficient evidence to prove the prosecution's allegations of kidnapping, wrongful confinement, rape and sexual assault of minors. The court awarded compensation of ₹1,00,000 to each victim under the Gujarat Victim Compensation Scheme, 2019. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Further Statement

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  7. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  8. 11-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  9. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  10. 03-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  11. 18-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  12. 18-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  13. 28-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  14. 13-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  15. 31-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  16. 11-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  17. 29-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  18. 25-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  19. 18-Nov-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  20. 10-Nov-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  21. 30-Oct-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  22. 16-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  23. 16-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 26/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted both accused persons of charges under the Indian Penal Code sections 363, 366, 376, 506(2), 114 and POCSO Act sections 4, 6, 8, finding insufficient evidence to prove the prosecution's allegations of kidnapping, wrongful confinement, rape and sexual assault of minors. The court awarded compensation of ₹1,00,000 to each victim under the Gujarat Victim Compensation Scheme, 2019. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case