Vimalbhai Rameshbhai Ujiya vs The state of Gujarat Advocate - S B JETHWA — 115/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: GJPB010012912025
Filing Number
115/2025
Filing Date
08-10-2025
Registration No
115/2025
Registration Date
08-10-2025
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT PORBANDAR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vimalbhai Rameshbhai Ujiya
Adv. N D JUNGI
Respondent(s)
The state of Gujarat Advocate - S B JETHWA
Shriram Transport Finance Co.Ltd Authorised Officer Nilesh Jadavbhai Jungi
Adv. D M RUPARELIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Disposed
FINAL HEARING
FINAL HEARING
FINAL HEARING
FINAL HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | FINAL HEARING |
| 19-02-2026 | FINAL HEARING |
| 15-01-2026 | FINAL HEARING |
| 10-12-2025 | FINAL HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court allowed Vimalbhai Rameshbhai Ujiya's criminal appeal and set aside his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act (cheque dishonour) after the original complainant filed a compromise petition stating full settlement had been received and requested withdrawal. The Sessions Judge disposed of the appeal based on the amicable settlement reached during National Lok Adalat, citing Supreme Court precedent that compensation is the primary objective and compounding is permissible at later stages with appropriate compensation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The court allowed Vimalbhai Rameshbhai Ujiya's criminal appeal and set aside his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act (cheque dishonour) after the original complainant filed a compromise petition stating full settlement had been received and requested withdrawal. The Sessions Judge disposed of the appeal based on the amicable settlement reached during National Lok Adalat, citing Supreme Court precedent that compensation is the primary objective and compounding is permissible at later stages with appropriate compensation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts