The State of Gujarat vs Ajay Balubhai Karavadara Advocate - N J JADEJA — 79/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 108. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 22nd May 2026.

SC - SESSIONS CASE

CNR: GJPB010010872025

Case disposed

Filing Number

79/2025

Filing Date

30-08-2025

Registration No

79/2025

Registration Date

30-08-2025

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT PORBANDAR

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

Decision Date

22nd May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11218003250361

Police Station

BAGVADAR POLICE STATION - PORBANDAR DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 108

Petitioner(s)

The State of Gujarat

Adv. S B JETHWA

Respondent(s)

Ajay Balubhai Karavadara Advocate - N J JADEJA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

22-05-2026

Disposed

14-05-2026

JUDGEMENT

13-05-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

07-05-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

23-04-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

22-05-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary of Sessions Case No. 79/2025 Court: District Sessions Court, Porbandar, Gujarat Judge: M.A. Bhatti, Sessions Judge Date of Judgment: June 22, 2025 Decision The court acquitted and discharged the accused Ajay Balubhai Karavadara under IPC Section 108 (abetment of suicide), finding the prosecution failed to prove the charge beyond reasonable doubt. Key Facts The case involved the death of Kajalbai (wife of complainant Nilesh Ramdevbhai Karavadara) on June 10, 2025, who died by hanging. The prosecution alleged the accused had harassed and threatened Kajalbai repeatedly, pressuring her to maintain a relationship with him and threatening to defame her if she refused, ultimately driving her to suicide. Court's Reasoning The court found that despite medical evidence confirming death by asphyxiation, the prosecution failed to establish any direct act of instigation or abetment by the accused. Citing Supreme Court precedents (*Kamalakar v. State of Karnataka*, *Amalendu Pal v. State of West Bengal*), the court held that mere suspicion is insufficient; there must be clear, positive acts creating circumstances leaving the deceased no option but suicide. No suicide note was produced, and key witnesses could not establish the accused's role in driving the victim to take her life. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Sessions Case No. 79/2025 Court: District Sessions Court, Porbandar, Gujarat Judge: M.A. Bhatti, Sessions Judge Date of Judgment: June 22, 2025 Decision The court acquitted and discharged the accused Ajay Balubhai Karavadara under IPC Section 108 (abetment of suicide), finding the prosecution failed to prove the charge beyond reasonable doubt. Key Facts The case involved the death of Kajalbai (wife of complainant Nilesh Ramdevbhai Karavadara) on June 10, 2025, who died by hanging. The prosecution alleged the accused had harassed and threatened Kajalbai repeatedly, pressuring her to maintain a relationship with him and threatening to defame her if she refused, ultimately driving her to suicide. Court's Reasoning The court found that despite medical evidence confirming death by asphyxiation, the prosecution failed to establish any direct act of instigation or abetment by the accused. Citing Supreme Court precedents (*Kamalakar v. State of Karnataka*, *Amalendu Pal v. State of West Bengal*), the court held that mere suspicion is insufficient; there must be clear, positive acts creating circumstances leaving the deceased no option but suicide. No suicide note was produced, and key witnesses could not establish the accused's role in driving the victim to take her life. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT PORBANDAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case