The State of Gujarat vs Ajay Balubhai Karavadara Advocate - N J JADEJA — 79/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 108. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 22nd May 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: GJPB010010872025
Filing Number
79/2025
Filing Date
30-08-2025
Registration No
79/2025
Registration Date
30-08-2025
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT PORBANDAR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Decision Date
22nd May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11218003250361
Police Station
BAGVADAR POLICE STATION - PORBANDAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Gujarat
Adv. S B JETHWA
Respondent(s)
Ajay Balubhai Karavadara Advocate - N J JADEJA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 14-05-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 13-05-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 07-05-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 23-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Sessions Case No. 79/2025 Court: District Sessions Court, Porbandar, Gujarat Judge: M.A. Bhatti, Sessions Judge Date of Judgment: June 22, 2025 Decision The court acquitted and discharged the accused Ajay Balubhai Karavadara under IPC Section 108 (abetment of suicide), finding the prosecution failed to prove the charge beyond reasonable doubt. Key Facts The case involved the death of Kajalbai (wife of complainant Nilesh Ramdevbhai Karavadara) on June 10, 2025, who died by hanging. The prosecution alleged the accused had harassed and threatened Kajalbai repeatedly, pressuring her to maintain a relationship with him and threatening to defame her if she refused, ultimately driving her to suicide. Court's Reasoning The court found that despite medical evidence confirming death by asphyxiation, the prosecution failed to establish any direct act of instigation or abetment by the accused. Citing Supreme Court precedents (*Kamalakar v. State of Karnataka*, *Amalendu Pal v. State of West Bengal*), the court held that mere suspicion is insufficient; there must be clear, positive acts creating circumstances leaving the deceased no option but suicide. No suicide note was produced, and key witnesses could not establish the accused's role in driving the victim to take her life. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Sessions Case No. 79/2025 Court: District Sessions Court, Porbandar, Gujarat Judge: M.A. Bhatti, Sessions Judge Date of Judgment: June 22, 2025 Decision The court acquitted and discharged the accused Ajay Balubhai Karavadara under IPC Section 108 (abetment of suicide), finding the prosecution failed to prove the charge beyond reasonable doubt. Key Facts The case involved the death of Kajalbai (wife of complainant Nilesh Ramdevbhai Karavadara) on June 10, 2025, who died by hanging. The prosecution alleged the accused had harassed and threatened Kajalbai repeatedly, pressuring her to maintain a relationship with him and threatening to defame her if she refused, ultimately driving her to suicide. Court's Reasoning The court found that despite medical evidence confirming death by asphyxiation, the prosecution failed to establish any direct act of instigation or abetment by the accused. Citing Supreme Court precedents (*Kamalakar v. State of Karnataka*, *Amalendu Pal v. State of West Bengal*), the court held that mere suspicion is insufficient; there must be clear, positive acts creating circumstances leaving the deceased no option but suicide. No suicide note was produced, and key witnesses could not establish the accused's role in driving the victim to take her life. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts