Rajshi Kara Godhaniya vs Ramabhai Harbhambhai Godhaniya Power Holder of Bhimabhai Harbhambhai Godhaniya Advocate - N D KHATRI — 37/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96,41. Status: FINAL HEARING. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

RCA - REGULAR CIVIL APPEAL

CNR: GJPB010008742024

FINAL HEARING

Next Hearing

12th June 2026

Filing Number

37/2024

Filing Date

01-07-2024

Registration No

37/2024

Registration Date

01-07-2024

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT PORBANDAR

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 Section 96,41

Petitioner(s)

Rajshi Kara Godhaniya

Adv. S H PARMAR

Karabhai Chhaganbhai Godhaniya

Adv. S H PARMAR

Respondent(s)

Ramabhai Harbhambhai Godhaniya Power Holder of Bhimabhai Harbhambhai Godhaniya Advocate - N D KHATRI

Ranmalbhai Ramabhai Godhaniya

Adv. N D KHATRI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

01-05-2026

FINAL HEARING

10-04-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

13-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

13-02-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

30-01-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

Interim Orders

01-02-2025
ORDER
25-02-2025
ORDER

Case 37/2024 Summary: The respondents (original plaintiffs) requested a two-week adjournment of the civil appeal, citing that the appeal is time-barred and that they have challenged the court's rejection order before the Gujarat High Court in Special Civil Application No. 2451/2025. The Principal District Judge rejected the adjournment application on 25 February 2025, finding the grounds unconvincing, particularly noting the High Court had not stayed the appeal proceedings. No costs were imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 37/2024 Summary: The respondents (original plaintiffs) requested a two-week adjournment of the civil appeal, citing that the appeal is time-barred and that they have challenged the court's rejection order before the Gujarat High Court in Special Civil Application No. 2451/2025. The Principal District Judge rejected the adjournment application on 25 February 2025, finding the grounds unconvincing, particularly noting the High Court had not stayed the appeal proceedings. No costs were imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT PORBANDAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case