Heirs of deceased Rabari Bijal Gogan, Tejal Prameybhai Kakkad vs Heirs of Deceased Jainubhai Nazarali Marchant, Nafisa Jainu Marchant Advocate - S J JOSHI — 24/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96,41. Status: FINAL HEARING. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

RCA - REGULAR CIVIL APPEAL

CNR: GJPB010007382024

FINAL HEARING

Next Hearing

18th June 2026

Filing Number

24/2024

Filing Date

10-06-2024

Registration No

24/2024

Registration Date

10-06-2024

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT PORBANDAR

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 Section 96,41

Petitioner(s)

Heirs of deceased Rabari Bijal Gogan, Tejal Prameybhai Kakkad

Adv. N D KAKKAD

Heirs of deceased Rabari Manda Bijal, Tejal Prameybhai Kakkad

Adv. N D KAKKAD

Respondent(s)

Heirs of Deceased Jainubhai Nazarali Marchant, Nafisa Jainu Marchant Advocate - S J JOSHI

Sahiba Daughter of Jenu Marchant Wife of Sohil Patel

Adv. S J JOSHI

Minaz Daughter of Jenu Marchant Wife of Yusuf Bharmal

Adv. S J JOSHI

Raj Son of Jainu Marchant

Adv. S J JOSHI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

06-05-2026

FINAL HEARING

08-04-2026

FINAL HEARING

11-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

11-02-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

07-01-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

Interim Orders

27-08-2024
JUDEGEMENT

Summary: The Principal District Judge at Porbandar allowed the stay application filed by the appellants under Order-41, Rule-5 of the CPC. The court stayed the execution of the judgment and decree dated 18.04.2024 (from civil suits nos. 13/2012 & 16/2012) till final disposal of the appeal, finding prima-facie merit in the appellants' contention that execution would frustrate their right of appeal. No costs were imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Principal District Judge at Porbandar allowed the stay application filed by the appellants under Order-41, Rule-5 of the CPC. The court stayed the execution of the judgment and decree dated 18.04.2024 (from civil suits nos. 13/2012 & 16/2012) till final disposal of the appeal, finding prima-facie merit in the appellants' contention that execution would frustrate their right of appeal. No costs were imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT PORBANDAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case