District Collector Shree Porbandar vs Mer Rajabhai Gangabhai Advocate - B B LAKHANI — 22/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96,41. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 21st April 2026.

Case disposed

RCA - REGULAR CIVIL APPEAL

CNR: GJPB010006262022

Filing Number

22/2022

Filing Date

20-Jul-2022

Registration No

22/2022

Registration Date

20-Jul-2022

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT PORBANDAR

Judge

1-Principal District & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

21-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGEMENT

Last updated 15-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 96,41

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.District Collector Shree Porbandar

    Adv. A J LILA

  2. 2.Mamalatdar Shree Porbandar

    Adv. A J LILA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mer Rajabhai Gangabhai Advocate - B B LAKHANI

  2. 2.Mer Bhurabhai Gangabhai

    Adv. B B LAKHANI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    The Court of Principal District Judge, Porbandar dismissed the appeal and confirmed the trial court's judgment declaring the respondents as legal owners of the disputed agricultural land. The court found that the respondents lawfully purchased the property via registered sale deeds in 1979 as minors through their guardian, and the subsequent land auction by the Mamlatdar was illegal due to lack of mandatory notice under Section 135D of the Bombay Land Revenue Code. However, the court modified the decree to require the respondents to pay Rs. 8,856-40 paise with 6% simple interest from 1989 to 2026 within 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  5. 06-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  6. 30-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  8. 11-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  9. 07-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  10. 03-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  11. 04-Nov-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  12. 30-Sep-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  13. 02-Sep-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  14. 04-Aug-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  15. 08-Jul-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  16. 16-Jun-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  17. 25-Apr-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  18. 26-Mar-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  19. 03-Mar-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  20. 04-Feb-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  21. 07-Jan-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  22. 13-Dec-2024

    Final Arguments

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  23. 22-Nov-2024

    Final Arguments

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  24. 21-Oct-2024

    Final Arguments

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  25. 26-Sep-2024

    Final Arguments

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  26. 03-Sep-2024

    Final Arguments

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  27. 12-Aug-2024

    Final Arguments

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  28. 19-Jul-2024

    Final Arguments

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  29. 26-Jun-2024

    Final Arguments

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  30. 09-May-2024

    Final Arguments

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  31. 12-Apr-2024

    Final Arguments

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  32. 20-Mar-2024

    Final Arguments

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  33. 21-Feb-2024

    Final Arguments

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  34. 25-Jan-2024

    Final Arguments

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  35. 29-Dec-2023

    Final Arguments

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  36. 01-Dec-2023

    Final Arguments

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  37. 30-Oct-2023

    Final Arguments

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  38. 26-Sep-2023

    Final Arguments

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  39. 28-Aug-2023

    Final Arguments

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  40. 04-Aug-2023

    Final Arguments

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  41. 05-Jul-2023

    Final Arguments

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  42. 08-Jun-2023

    Final Arguments

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  43. 21-Apr-2023

    Final Arguments

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  44. 17-Mar-2023

    Final Arguments

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  45. 03-Feb-2023

    OrderView PDF

  46. 03-Feb-2023

    OrderView PDF

  47. 03-Feb-2023

    Final Arguments

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  48. 30-Jan-2023

    Reply

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  49. 27-Jan-2023

    Reply

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  50. 20-Jan-2023

    Reply

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  51. 17-Dec-2022

    Reply

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  52. 16-Nov-2022

    Reply

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  53. 21-Oct-2022

    Reply

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  54. 26-Sep-2022

    Service Of Process

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  55. 24-Aug-2022

    Service Of Process

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  56. 10-Aug-2022

    Service Of Process

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  57. 20-Jul-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  58. 20-Jul-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 22/2022

casestatus.in Summary

The Court of Principal District Judge, Porbandar dismissed the appeal and confirmed the trial court's judgment declaring the respondents as legal owners of the disputed agricultural land. The court found that the respondents lawfully purchased the property via registered sale deeds in 1979 as minors through their guardian, and the subsequent land auction by the Mamlatdar was illegal due to lack of mandatory notice under Section 135D of the Bombay Land Revenue Code. However, the court modified the decree to require the respondents to pay Rs. 8,856-40 paise with 6% simple interest from 1989 to 2026 within 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case