District Collector Shree Porbandar vs Mer Rajabhai Gangabhai Advocate - B B LAKHANI — 22/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96,41. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 21st April 2026.
RCA - REGULAR CIVIL APPEAL
CNR: GJPB010006262022
Filing Number
22/2022
Filing Date
20-07-2022
Registration No
22/2022
Registration Date
20-07-2022
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT PORBANDAR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Decision Date
21st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
District Collector Shree Porbandar
Adv. A J LILA
Mamalatdar Shree Porbandar
Adv. A J LILA
Respondent(s)
Mer Rajabhai Gangabhai Advocate - B B LAKHANI
Mer Bhurabhai Gangabhai
Adv. B B LAKHANI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 06-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 30-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 11-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Court of Principal District Judge, Porbandar dismissed the appeal and confirmed the trial court's judgment declaring the respondents as legal owners of the disputed agricultural land. The court found that the respondents lawfully purchased the property via registered sale deeds in 1979 as minors through their guardian, and the subsequent land auction by the Mamlatdar was illegal due to lack of mandatory notice under Section 135D of the Bombay Land Revenue Code. However, the court modified the decree to require the respondents to pay Rs. 8,856-40 paise with 6% simple interest from 1989 to 2026 within 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Court of Principal District Judge, Porbandar dismissed the appeal and confirmed the trial court's judgment declaring the respondents as legal owners of the disputed agricultural land. The court found that the respondents lawfully purchased the property via registered sale deeds in 1979 as minors through their guardian, and the subsequent land auction by the Mamlatdar was illegal due to lack of mandatory notice under Section 135D of the Bombay Land Revenue Code. However, the court modified the decree to require the respondents to pay Rs. 8,856-40 paise with 6% simple interest from 1989 to 2026 within 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts