Bhikhuji Devaji Odedra vs Union Of India Through Secretary Ministry Of Roads And Transportation Goverment Of India — 29/2022

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34. Status: ORDER. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

CMA DC - CIVIL MISC. APPLICATION - DISTRICT COURT

CNR: GJPB010005702022

ORDER

Next Hearing

12th June 2026

Filing Number

29/2022

Filing Date

07-07-2022

Registration No

29/2022

Registration Date

07-07-2022

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT PORBANDAR

Judge

2-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

Acts & Sections

ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 Section 34

Petitioner(s)

Bhikhuji Devaji Odedra

Adv. R H SUTARIA

Respondent(s)

Union Of India Through Secretary Ministry Of Roads And Transportation Goverment Of India

National High Way Authority Of India Project Implimation Unit Rajkot

Adv. P K CHANDARANA

National High Way Authority Officer Authority of India And Nayab Collecter Sir,Porbandar

Adv. ADGP A.J.LILA

Hearing History

Judge: 2-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

30-04-2026

ORDER

10-04-2026

ORDER

13-03-2026

ORDER

06-03-2026

REPLY

21-02-2026

NOTICE TO OPPONENTS

Interim Orders

07-05-2025
ORDER

Case Summary: CMA-DC No. 29 of 2022 The petition filed by Bhikhuji Devaji Odedra against the Union of India and National Highway Authority of India was dismissed on 7th May 2025 due to lack of prosecution. Neither the petitioner nor respondents appeared before the court despite proper notice and intimation. The court dismissed the petition under CPC provisions, but permitted restoration if the applicant files for it in future, which will be considered sympathetically. No costs ordered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CMA-DC No. 29 of 2022 The petition filed by Bhikhuji Devaji Odedra against the Union of India and National Highway Authority of India was dismissed on 7th May 2025 due to lack of prosecution. Neither the petitioner nor respondents appeared before the court despite proper notice and intimation. The court dismissed the petition under CPC provisions, but permitted restoration if the applicant files for it in future, which will be considered sympathetically. No costs ordered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT PORBANDAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case