Ram Parbat Odedra vs Union Of India Through Secretary Ministry Of Roads And Transportation Goverment Of India — 27/2022
Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34. Status: ORDER. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
CMA DC - CIVIL MISC. APPLICATION - DISTRICT COURT
CNR: GJPB010005682022
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
Filing Number
27/2022
Filing Date
07-07-2022
Registration No
27/2022
Registration Date
07-07-2022
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT PORBANDAR
Judge
2-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ram Parbat Odedra
Adv. R H SUTARIA
Bhima Duda Modhvadiya
Adv. R H SUTARIA
Respondent(s)
Union Of India Through Secretary Ministry Of Roads And Transportation Goverment Of India
National High Way Authority Of India Project Implimation Unit Rajkot
Adv. P K CHANDARANA
National High Way Authority Officer Authority of India And Nayab Collecter Sir,Porbandar
Adv. ADGP A.J.LILA
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
ORDER
ORDER
ORDER
REPLY
NOTICE TO OPPONENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | ORDER |
| 10-04-2026 | ORDER |
| 13-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 06-03-2026 | REPLY |
| 21-02-2026 | NOTICE TO OPPONENTS |
Interim Orders
Case Summary (CMA-DC No. 27/2022): The petition filed by Ram Parbat Odedra and Bhima Duda Modhvadiya against the Union of India and National Highway Authority of India was dismissed on 7th May 2025. The court dismissed the matter due to lack of interest shown by the parties and their advocates, who failed to appear despite proper notice and intimation. The court stated it will consider sympathetic restoration if the applicant files for restoration in the future, with no costs imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary (CMA-DC No. 27/2022): The petition filed by Ram Parbat Odedra and Bhima Duda Modhvadiya against the Union of India and National Highway Authority of India was dismissed on 7th May 2025. The court dismissed the matter due to lack of interest shown by the parties and their advocates, who failed to appear despite proper notice and intimation. The court stated it will consider sympathetic restoration if the applicant files for restoration in the future, with no costs imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts