Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Ltd. vs Lilabhai Virambhai Kadchha Advocate - B V JOSHI — 21/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96,41. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

RCA - REGULAR CIVIL APPEAL

CNR: GJPB010004932023

Filing Number

21/2023

Filing Date

09-Jun-2023

Registration No

21/2023

Registration Date

09-Jun-2023

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT PORBANDAR

Judge

1-Principal District & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGEMENT

Last updated 31-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 96,41

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Ltd.

    Adv. H K GORANIA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Lilabhai Virambhai Kadchha Advocate - B V JOSHI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    The appellate court upheld the trial court's finding that Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Ltd. was liable for negligence in failing to maintain an electric pole that fell and killed the respondent's buffalo. However, the court reduced the compensation from Rs. 1,50,000 to Rs. 1,00,000 by rejecting the trial court's award for future lost milk income as speculative, while retaining compensation for the buffalo's death value and inconvenience. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  6. 20-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  7. 27-Jan-2026

    Reply

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  8. 23-Dec-2025

    Reply

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  9. 21-Nov-2025

    Reply

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  10. 17-Oct-2025

    Reply

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  11. 17-Sep-2025

    Reply

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  12. 19-Aug-2025

    Reply

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  13. 25-Jul-2025

    Reply

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  14. 18-Jul-2025

    Reply

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  15. 20-Jun-2025

    Reply

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  16. 01-May-2025

    Reply

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  17. 16-Apr-2025

    Reply

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  18. 19-Mar-2025

    Reply

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  19. 19-Feb-2025

    Reply

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  20. 27-Jan-2025

    Reply

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  21. 30-Dec-2024

    Reply

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  22. 04-Dec-2024

    Reply

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  23. 06-Nov-2024

    Reply

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  24. 04-Oct-2024

    Reply

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  25. 13-Sep-2024

    Reply

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  26. 22-Aug-2024

    Reply

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  27. 29-Jul-2024

    Reply

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  28. 08-Jul-2024

    Reply

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  29. 14-Jun-2024

    Reply

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  30. 04-May-2024

    Reply

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  31. 16-Apr-2024

    Reply

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  32. 21-Mar-2024

    Reply

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  33. 22-Feb-2024

    Reply

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  34. 29-Jan-2024

    Reply

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  35. 12-Jan-2024

    Reply

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  36. 01-Jan-2024

    Reply

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  37. 07-Dec-2023

    Reply

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  38. 01-Dec-2023

    Reply

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  39. 02-Nov-2023

    Reply

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  40. 30-Sep-2023

    Reply

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  41. 16-Sep-2023

    Reply

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  42. 08-Sep-2023

    Reply

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  43. 09-Aug-2023

    Reply

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  44. 20-Jul-2023

    Reply

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  45. 08-Jul-2023

    Reply

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  46. 28-Jun-2023

    Reply

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  47. 09-Jun-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  48. 09-Jun-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 21/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The appellate court upheld the trial court's finding that Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Ltd. was liable for negligence in failing to maintain an electric pole that fell and killed the respondent's buffalo. However, the court reduced the compensation from Rs. 1,50,000 to Rs. 1,00,000 by rejecting the trial court's award for future lost milk income as speculative, while retaining compensation for the buffalo's death value and inconvenience. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case