Saurashtra Cement Ltd, Throuigh power of Attorney Yogeshkumar Bhanushankar Joshi vs Parth Cement and Chemicals Industries Partnership Firm Advocate - N B SHAH From Ahmedabad — 1/2023
Case under Trade Marks Act, 1999 Section 26,27,28,28,134,135. Status: HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
TMSUIT - TRADE MARK SUIT
CNR: GJPB010004922023
Next Hearing
20th June 2026
Filing Number
1/2023
Filing Date
08-06-2023
Registration No
1/2023
Registration Date
08-06-2023
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT PORBANDAR
Judge
2-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Saurashtra Cement Ltd, Throuigh power of Attorney Yogeshkumar Bhanushankar Joshi
Adv. H D PUROHIT and JAYAVIN K JOSHI, J K JOSHI
Respondent(s)
Parth Cement and Chemicals Industries Partnership Firm Advocate - N B SHAH From Ahmedabad
Jitendra Govindbhai Vaish Partner of Parth Cement and Chemicals Industries Partnership Firm
Adv. N B SHAH From Ahmedabad
Nishitbhai Mahendrabhai Manek Patner of Parth Cement and Chemicals Industries Partnership Firm
Adv. N B SHAH From Ahmedabad
Sureshbhai Vallabhabhai Bhuva Parth Cement and Chemicals Industries Partnership Firm
Adv. N B SHAH From Ahmedabad
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION
HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION
HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION
HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION
HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION |
| 15-04-2026 | HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION |
| 06-04-2026 | HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION |
| 01-04-2026 | HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION |
| 13-03-2026 | HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Trade Mark Suit No. 1/2023 Outcome: Defendants' application to reject the plaint was rejected. The court allowed Saurashtra Cement Ltd's trademark infringement suit against Parth Cement and Chemicals Industries to proceed to trial. Key Holdings: The court held that the Commercial Courts Act requirements (pre-institution mediation and specified value provisions) do not apply to trademark suits governed by the Trade Marks Act, 1999. Defenses regarding limitation, knowledge of the mark since 2005, and acquiescence require factual evidence and cannot be decided at the plaint rejection stage. The plaintiff had demonstrated proper court fee payment and valid authorization through Power of Attorney. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Trade Mark Suit No. 1/2023 Outcome: Defendants' application to reject the plaint was rejected. The court allowed Saurashtra Cement Ltd's trademark infringement suit against Parth Cement and Chemicals Industries to proceed to trial. Key Holdings: The court held that the Commercial Courts Act requirements (pre-institution mediation and specified value provisions) do not apply to trademark suits governed by the Trade Marks Act, 1999. Defenses regarding limitation, knowledge of the mark since 2005, and acquiescence require factual evidence and cannot be decided at the plaint rejection stage. The plaintiff had demonstrated proper court fee payment and valid authorization through Power of Attorney. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts