Saurashtra Cement Ltd, Throuigh power of Attorney Yogeshkumar Bhanushankar Joshi vs Parth Cement and Chemicals Industries Partnership Firm Advocate - N B SHAH From Ahmedabad — 1/2023
Case under Trade Marks Act, 1999 Section 26,27,28,28,134,135. Status: Hearing On Injunction Application. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
TMSUIT - TRADE MARK SUIT
CNR: GJPB010004922023
Filing Number
1/2023
Filing Date
08-Jun-2023
Registration No
1/2023
Registration Date
08-Jun-2023
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT PORBANDAR
Judge
2-Addl.district & Sessions Judge
Last updated 31-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Saurashtra Cement Ltd, Throuigh power of Attorney Yogeshkumar Bhanushankar Joshi
Adv. H D PUROHIT and JAYAVIN K JOSHI, J K JOSHI
Respondent(s)
-
1.Parth Cement and Chemicals Industries Partnership Firm Advocate - N B SHAH From Ahmedabad
-
2.Jitendra Govindbhai Vaish Partner of Parth Cement and Chemicals Industries Partnership Firm
Adv. N B SHAH From Ahmedabad
-
3.Nishitbhai Mahendrabhai Manek Patner of Parth Cement and Chemicals Industries Partnership Firm
Adv. N B SHAH From Ahmedabad
-
4.Sureshbhai Vallabhabhai Bhuva Parth Cement and Chemicals Industries Partnership Firm
Adv. N B SHAH From Ahmedabad
Case History
-
20-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
27-Apr-2026
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
15-Apr-2026
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
06-Apr-2026
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
01-Apr-2026
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
07-Feb-2026
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
09-Jan-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: Trade Mark Suit No. 1/2023 Outcome: Defendants' application to reject the plaint was rejected. The court allowed Saurashtra Cement Ltd's trademark infringement suit against Parth Cement and Chemicals Industries to proceed to trial. Key Holdings: The court held that the Commercial Courts Act requirements (pre-institution mediation and specified value provisions) do not apply to trademark suits governed by the Trade Marks Act, 1999. Defenses regarding limitation, knowledge of the mark since 2005, and acquiescence require factual evidence and cannot be decided at the plaint rejection stage. The plaintiff had demonstrated proper court fee payment and valid authorization through Power of Attorney. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Jan-2026
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
12-Dec-2025
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
21-Nov-2025
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
01-Nov-2025
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
10-Oct-2025
OrderView PDF
-
10-Oct-2025
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
12-Sep-2025
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
22-Aug-2025
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
02-Aug-2025
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
07-Jul-2025
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
16-Jun-2025
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
16-Apr-2025
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
08-Mar-2025
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
18-Feb-2025
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
27-Jan-2025
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
14-Dec-2024
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
14-Oct-2024
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
09-Aug-2024
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
14-Jun-2024
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
09-May-2024
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
05-Apr-2024
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
18-Mar-2024
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
16-Feb-2024
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
20-Jan-2024
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
21-Dec-2023
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
29-Nov-2023
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
23-Oct-2023
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
18-Sep-2023
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
08-Aug-2023
Reply To Counter Claim
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
13-Jul-2023
Written Statement/Reply
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
08-Jun-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Jun-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 1/2023
Case Summary: Trade Mark Suit No. 1/2023 Outcome: Defendants' application to reject the plaint was rejected. The court allowed Saurashtra Cement Ltd's trademark infringement suit against Parth Cement and Chemicals Industries to proceed to trial. Key Holdings: The court held that the Commercial Courts Act requirements (pre-institution mediation and specified value provisions) do not apply to trademark suits governed by the Trade Marks Act, 1999. Defenses regarding limitation, knowledge of the mark since 2005, and acquiescence require factual evidence and cannot be decided at the plaint rejection stage. The plaintiff had demonstrated proper court fee payment and valid authorization through Power of Attorney. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts