Ilaben Lalajibhai Todarmal vs Union Of India Through Secretary Ministry Of Roads And Transportation Goverment Of India — 23/2022
Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34. Status: ORDER. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
CMA DC - CIVIL MISC. APPLICATION - DISTRICT COURT
CNR: GJPB010004772022
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
Filing Number
23/2022
Filing Date
18-06-2022
Registration No
23/2022
Registration Date
18-06-2022
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT PORBANDAR
Judge
2-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ilaben Lalajibhai Todarmal
Adv. R H SUTARIA
Respondent(s)
Union Of India Through Secretary Ministry Of Roads And Transportation Goverment Of India
National High Way Authority Of India Project Implimation Unit Rajkot
Adv. P K CHANDARANA
National High Way Authority Officer Authority of India And Nayab Collecter Sir,Porbandar
Adv. ADGP A.J.LILA
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
ORDER
ORDER
ORDER
REPLY
NOTICE TO OPPONENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | ORDER |
| 10-04-2026 | ORDER |
| 13-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 06-03-2026 | REPLY |
| 21-02-2026 | NOTICE TO OPPONENTS |
Interim Orders
Case 23/2022 Summary: Ilaben Lalajibhai Todarmal's petition against the Union of India and National Highway Authority was dismissed on 7 May 2025 due to lack of prosecution. Neither the petitioner nor respondents appeared despite proper notice, and the case had remained pending at the hearing stage for an extended period. The court dismissed the petition under CPC provisions but indicated willingness to consider restoration if the applicant files for it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 23/2022 Summary: Ilaben Lalajibhai Todarmal's petition against the Union of India and National Highway Authority was dismissed on 7 May 2025 due to lack of prosecution. Neither the petitioner nor respondents appeared despite proper notice, and the case had remained pending at the hearing stage for an extended period. The court dismissed the petition under CPC provisions but indicated willingness to consider restoration if the applicant files for it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts