Alpaben Laljibhai Todarmal vs Union Of India Through Secretary Ministry Of Roads And Transportation Goverment Of India — 22/2022

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34. Status: ORDER. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

CMA DC - CIVIL MISC. APPLICATION - DISTRICT COURT

CNR: GJPB010004762022

ORDER

Next Hearing

12th June 2026

Filing Number

22/2022

Filing Date

18-06-2022

Registration No

22/2022

Registration Date

18-06-2022

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT PORBANDAR

Judge

2-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

Acts & Sections

ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 Section 34

Petitioner(s)

Alpaben Laljibhai Todarmal

Adv. R H SUTARIA

Respondent(s)

Union Of India Through Secretary Ministry Of Roads And Transportation Goverment Of India

National High Way Authority Of India Project Implimation Unit Rajkot

Adv. P K CHANDARANA

National High Way Authority Officer Authority of India And Nayab Collecter Sir,Porbandar

Adv. ADGP A.J.LILA

Hearing History

Judge: 2-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

30-04-2026

ORDER

10-04-2026

ORDER

13-03-2026

ORDER

06-03-2026

REPLY

21-02-2026

NOTICE TO OPPONENTS

Interim Orders

07-05-2025
ORDER

Case Summary: Petition CMA-DC No. 22/2022 filed by Alpaben Laljibhai Todarmal against Union of India and National Highway Authority was dismissed on 7th May 2025 due to non-appearance of all parties and their advocates despite proper notice. The court found the matter was old with no party showing interest in proceeding, and dismissed it under CPC provisions, leaving open the option for restoration if the applicant refiles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Petition CMA-DC No. 22/2022 filed by Alpaben Laljibhai Todarmal against Union of India and National Highway Authority was dismissed on 7th May 2025 due to non-appearance of all parties and their advocates despite proper notice. The court found the matter was old with no party showing interest in proceeding, and dismissed it under CPC provisions, leaving open the option for restoration if the applicant refiles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT PORBANDAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case