Noghanbhai Rambhai Odedra vs The State of Gujarat Advocate - A J LILA — 110/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 18th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJPB010003702026
Filing Number
110/2026
Filing Date
10-Mar-2026
Registration No
110/2026
Registration Date
10-Mar-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT PORBANDAR
Judge
1-Principal District & Sessions Judge
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 31-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11218003260084
Police Station
BAGVADAR POLICE STATION - PORBANDAR DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Noghanbhai Rambhai Odedra
Adv. R B AGATH
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Gujarat Advocate - A J LILA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: 110/2026 Court Decision: The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Noghanbhai Rambhai Odedra, accused of cheating (IPC §316(2), 318(4)) in a commercial rice transaction dispute in Porbandar district. The Sessions Judge found sufficient prima facie evidence of fraudulent conduct, including sending fake payment screenshots and undated checks, combined with the accused's prior criminal history, history of non-compliance with police notices, and significant flight risk, rendering him ineligible for bail at this investigative stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Order
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 110/2026
Case Summary: 110/2026 Court Decision: The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Noghanbhai Rambhai Odedra, accused of cheating (IPC §316(2), 318(4)) in a commercial rice transaction dispute in Porbandar district. The Sessions Judge found sufficient prima facie evidence of fraudulent conduct, including sending fake payment screenshots and undated checks, combined with the accused's prior criminal history, history of non-compliance with police notices, and significant flight risk, rendering him ineligible for bail at this investigative stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts