Malde Giga Odedra vs The State of Gujarat Advocate - A J LILA — 107/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,(1). Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 17th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJPB010003502026

Case disposed

Filing Number

107/2026

Filing Date

09-03-2026

Registration No

107/2026

Registration Date

09-03-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT PORBANDAR

Judge

2-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

Decision Date

17th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGEMENT

FIR Details

FIR Number

28

Police Station

RANAVAV POLICE STATION - PORBANDAR DISTRICT

Year

2018

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483,(1)
INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 302,307,323,324,34,143,147,148,149,504,506(2)
GUJARAT (BOMBAY) POLICE ACT, 1951 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

Malde Giga Odedra

Adv. S D JOSHI

Respondent(s)

The State of Gujarat Advocate - A J LILA

Hearing History

Judge: 2-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

17-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

ORDER

11-03-2026

PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS

09-03-2026

PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

17-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

The court rejected petitioner Malde Giga Odedra's plea for temporary bail/land release, finding that the petitioner was accused of serious offenses under IPC sections 302, 307, 323, 336, 363, 373, 376, 376D, and 504, with allegations of causing grievous injuries and committing offenses on the same day. The court determined that releasing the petitioner on temporary bail would pose a flight risk and danger to witnesses, and that no exceptional circumstances justified bail at that stage of proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected petitioner Malde Giga Odedra's plea for temporary bail/land release, finding that the petitioner was accused of serious offenses under IPC sections 302, 307, 323, 336, 363, 373, 376, 376D, and 504, with allegations of causing grievous injuries and committing offenses on the same day. The court determined that releasing the petitioner on temporary bail would pose a flight risk and danger to witnesses, and that no exceptional circumstances justified bail at that stage of proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT PORBANDAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case