Katara Kanabhai Badhabhai vs The State of Gujarat Advocate - S B JETHWA — 9/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 438. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 13th March 2026.
CR RA - CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION
CNR: GJPB010003482026
Filing Number
9/2026
Filing Date
07-03-2026
Registration No
9/2026
Registration Date
07-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT PORBANDAR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
FIR Details
FIR Number
11218003260073
Police Station
BAGVADAR POLICE STATION - PORBANDAR DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Katara Kanabhai Badhabhai
Adv. V G PARMAR
Respondent(s)
The State of Gujarat Advocate - S B JETHWA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Disposed
FINAL HEARING
PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | FINAL HEARING |
| 07-03-2026 | PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Katara Kanabhai Badhabhai v. State of Gujarat (9/2026) The petitioner sought return of a seized motorcycle (Hero Honda Splendor Plus) under custody during a Prohibition Act case. The Sessions Court rejected the petition, ruling that under the Prohibition Act Section 98(2) and relevant regulations, seized vehicles carrying contraband liquor cannot be released on bond until the case concludes. The appellate court upheld this decision, finding the trial court's reasoning lawful and proper, and dismissed the revision application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Katara Kanabhai Badhabhai v. State of Gujarat (9/2026) The petitioner sought return of a seized motorcycle (Hero Honda Splendor Plus) under custody during a Prohibition Act case. The Sessions Court rejected the petition, ruling that under the Prohibition Act Section 98(2) and relevant regulations, seized vehicles carrying contraband liquor cannot be released on bond until the case concludes. The appellate court upheld this decision, finding the trial court's reasoning lawful and proper, and dismissed the revision application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts