Dipakbhai Samjibhai Chamudiya vs Jakharabhai Gangabhai Vagh - Owner — 43/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 105. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

MACMA - MAC MISC. APPLICATION

CNR: GJPB010002652026

Filing Number

43/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

43/2026

Registration Date

23-Feb-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT PORBANDAR

Judge

2-Addl.district & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 31-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 105

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Dipakbhai Samjibhai Chamudiya

    Adv. N S RATIYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Jakharabhai Gangabhai Vagh - Owner

  2. 2.Royal Sundaram Allience insurance co.ltd.

  3. 3.Nagajanbhai Ranmalbhai Modhavadiya - Driver

  4. 4.Mohammed Naseer Mohammed Ali - Owner

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in Porbandar allowed the petitioner Dipakbhai Samjibhai Chamudiya's claim for compensation arising from a motor vehicle accident, awarding Rs. 61,737 against the vehicle owner and driver for damages caused. The tribunal directed payment through account via check with proper documentation and authorized the district magistrate to enforce compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Notice To Opponents

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 43/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in Porbandar allowed the petitioner Dipakbhai Samjibhai Chamudiya's claim for compensation arising from a motor vehicle accident, awarding Rs. 61,737 against the vehicle owner and driver for damages caused. The tribunal directed payment through account via check with proper documentation and authorized the district magistrate to enforce compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case