Keshubhai Nagabhai Modhavadiya vs Ajay Pratapbhai Vadher - Driver — 42/2026
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 105. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.
MACMA - MAC MISC. APPLICATION
CNR: GJPB010002642026
Filing Number
42/2026
Filing Date
23-Feb-2026
Registration No
42/2026
Registration Date
23-Feb-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT PORBANDAR
Judge
2-Addl.district & Sessions Judge
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Last updated 31-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Keshubhai Nagabhai Modhavadiya
Adv. N S RATIYA
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ajay Pratapbhai Vadher - Driver
-
2.Popatbhai Karshanbhai Joshi
-
3.Jiteshbhai Govindji Majithiya - Owner
-
4.Bajaj Allince General insurance co. Ltd.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal allowed the petitioner Keshubhai Nagabhai Modhavadiya's claim for compensation arising from a motor vehicle accident, awarding a total of ₹2,04,513 with court fees of ₹3,400 to be deducted, leaving a net amount of ₹2,01,113 payable by the respondents (driver Ajay Pratapbhai Vadher and owners Popatbhai Karshanbhai Joshi and Jiteshbhai Govindji Majithiya). The court directed payment through a crossed check via an account payee mechanism and mandated compliance by the Nazir (court official). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
Notice To Opponents
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
23-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 42/2026
The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal allowed the petitioner Keshubhai Nagabhai Modhavadiya's claim for compensation arising from a motor vehicle accident, awarding a total of ₹2,04,513 with court fees of ₹3,400 to be deducted, leaving a net amount of ₹2,01,113 payable by the respondents (driver Ajay Pratapbhai Vadher and owners Popatbhai Karshanbhai Joshi and Jiteshbhai Govindji Majithiya). The court directed payment through a crossed check via an account payee mechanism and mandated compliance by the Nazir (court official). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts