Keshubhai Nagabhai Modhavadiya vs Ajay Pratapbhai Vadher - Driver — 42/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 105. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.

MACMA - MAC MISC. APPLICATION

CNR: GJPB010002642026

Case disposed

Filing Number

42/2026

Filing Date

23-02-2026

Registration No

42/2026

Registration Date

23-02-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT PORBANDAR

Judge

2-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 105

Petitioner(s)

Keshubhai Nagabhai Modhavadiya

Adv. N S RATIYA

Respondent(s)

Ajay Pratapbhai Vadher - Driver

Popatbhai Karshanbhai Joshi

Jiteshbhai Govindji Majithiya - Owner

Bajaj Allince General insurance co. Ltd.

Hearing History

Judge: 2-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

13-03-2026

Disposed

07-03-2026

NOTICE TO OPPONENTS

23-02-2026

NOTICE TO OPPONENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
ORDER

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal allowed the petitioner Keshubhai Nagabhai Modhavadiya's claim for compensation arising from a motor vehicle accident, awarding a total of ₹2,04,513 with court fees of ₹3,400 to be deducted, leaving a net amount of ₹2,01,113 payable by the respondents (driver Ajay Pratapbhai Vadher and owners Popatbhai Karshanbhai Joshi and Jiteshbhai Govindji Majithiya). The court directed payment through a crossed check via an account payee mechanism and mandated compliance by the Nazir (court official). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal allowed the petitioner Keshubhai Nagabhai Modhavadiya's claim for compensation arising from a motor vehicle accident, awarding a total of ₹2,04,513 with court fees of ₹3,400 to be deducted, leaving a net amount of ₹2,01,113 payable by the respondents (driver Ajay Pratapbhai Vadher and owners Popatbhai Karshanbhai Joshi and Jiteshbhai Govindji Majithiya). The court directed payment through a crossed check via an account payee mechanism and mandated compliance by the Nazir (court official). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT PORBANDAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case