STATE OF GUJARAT vs AJAYBHAI GIRISHBHAI BAGUL Advocate - S S DABKE — 102/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJNV130001132026

Filing Number

102/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

102/2026

Registration Date

03-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, SUBIR

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11219003250441

Police Station

SUBIR POLICE STATION - DANG DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AJAYBHAI GIRISHBHAI BAGUL Advocate - S S DABKE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    Summary The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 185 and Probation Act Section 66(1) for driving under the influence of alcohol. The court sentenced the accused to a fine of ₹200 (rupees two hundred only) and, in default of payment, simple imprisonment for two days, considering the accused's voluntary confession, financial hardship as the sole earner, and the principles of criminal justice that favor lenient sentences when appropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 102/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 185 and Probation Act Section 66(1) for driving under the influence of alcohol. The court sentenced the accused to a fine of ₹200 (rupees two hundred only) and, in default of payment, simple imprisonment for two days, considering the accused's voluntary confession, financial hardship as the sole earner, and the principles of criminal justice that favor lenient sentences when appropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case