STATE OF GUJARAT vs SOMUBHAI SITARAMBHAI BAGUL Advocate - S B PAWAR — 95/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJNV130001062026

Filing Number

95/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

95/2026

Registration Date

03-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, SUBIR

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1129003250431

Police Station

SUBIR POLICE STATION - DANG DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SOMUBHAI SITARAMBHAI BAGUL Advocate - S B PAWAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 185 and Probation of Offenders Act Section 66(1) for driving under the influence. The accused's voluntary confession was accepted as genuine considering his economic hardship and family circumstances. The court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 200 (in lieu of simple imprisonment for 2 days) and ordered confiscation of the vehicle, applying sentencing principles that balance justice with the accused's difficult financial situation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 95/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 185 and Probation of Offenders Act Section 66(1) for driving under the influence. The accused's voluntary confession was accepted as genuine considering his economic hardship and family circumstances. The court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 200 (in lieu of simple imprisonment for 2 days) and ordered confiscation of the vehicle, applying sentencing principles that balance justice with the accused's difficult financial situation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case